Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Walker Eviction Risk: High , Bell

Tract 06037533504 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,045 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Tract 06037533504 sits in the Walker area of Huntington Park, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.8/10.

Risk score

9.9

High

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 48% Stable renters 27% Owners 25%

Tract context

Occupied units945

Renter share74.7%

SVI overall0.86

Poverty rate19.2%

Median income$62,917

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Bell and the region

Centroid at 33.9848, -118.1933 · click any tract to drill in

Why Walker scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Bell

7.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

19.2% poverty · this tract

4.8

Supply constraint

$1,469 rent vs county FMR

1.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Bell

7.9

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.7

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Bell

9.8

Housing court bias

Inherited from Bell

7.7

How Walker compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

92%Socioeconomic
71%Household composition
99%Racial/ethnic minority
56%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
100%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Walker. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

31.8%Housing insecurity
13.0%Utility-shutoff threat
39.9%Food insecurity
33.8%SNAP enrollment
17.9%Transit barriers
27.8%No health insurance
19.6%Frequent mental distress
42.2%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Walker

Severe burden reaches 31%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10.

Housing insecurity runs 31.8% against 14.2% nationally. This is renter territory: 75% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

Adults with no health insurance runs 27.8% against 11.3% nationally. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 64% of renters here are cost-burdened.

It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.9/10. The poverty rate is 19%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037533504

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037533504?

Census tract 06037533504 in the Walker neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037533504?

Median gross rent is $1,469/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037533504?

19.2% of residents in tract 06037533504 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,045.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037533504?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 71th, minority 99th, housing 56th.

Is tract 06037533504 considered part of Walker?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037533504 fall within Walker (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037533504 struggle to pay rent?

About 31.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037533504 compare to Bell overall?

Tract 06037533504 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of Bell at 9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bell; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037533504 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Bell

Top eight tracts in Bell ranked by composite eviction-risk score.