Skip to content
Neighborhood · Bell, CA

Walker Eviction Risk: High

22 census tracts · pop 91,676 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 9.8/10 · range 8.8–9.9

Walker takes in 22 census tracts of Bell, CA and houses 91,676 people. That produces an Eviction Risk Score of 9.8/10, High tier. Against a Bell baseline of 40.3%, 58% of renters here cross the 30%-of-income line.

The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.8/10. The severe-burden share is 31%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay.

Food insecurity affects 39.3% of adults, 21.5 points above the national rate. This is a renter market: 74% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Running cool is supply constraint, at 1.2/10.

26.5% of adults carry no health insurance against 11.3% nationally, a common route into sudden unpayable debt. Sitting well above the midpoint is rent-regulation exposure at 8.3/10. The poverty rate is 21%, which shows up in this model as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

Internally this is not one market. Tract scores span 8.8 to 9.9, so two buildings inside the same boundary can carry materially different risk. Social vulnerability runs high at 9/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input.

Average gross rent runs $1,550, close to the Bell average. Annual rent works out to 32% of average household income of $58,584.

Underwrite the address, not the area: with 1.1 points between its best and worst tract, the per-tract table below is the operative number. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.

Risk score
9.8
High
22 tracts · population-weighted
Walker vs Bell How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
58.1% +44%
Bell: 40.3%
Average gross rent
$1,550 -2%
Bell: $1,575
Average HH income
$58,584 -3%
Bell: $60,641
Poverty rate
20.9% -8%
Bell: 22.8%
Renter share
74.3% +1%
Bell: 73.5%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Walker and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 22 tracts span score 8.8–9.9

Why Walker scores 9.8

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 6.8–6.8 across tracts
6.8
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 7.2–7.2 across tracts
7.2
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 7.5–7.5 across tracts
7.5
Rent control risk
58% of income on rent · Range 7.7–8.6 across tracts
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 6.2–6.9 across tracts
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
74% renter households · Range 8.8–9.9 across tracts
9.8
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 7.5–8.7 across tracts
8.2
Economic stress
20.9% below poverty line · Range 2.1–8.0 across tracts
5.2
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 1.0–1.9 across tracts
1.2
Risk score comparison

Walker vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Walker score vs. parent city, state, U.S.9.8WalkerNeighborhood9.0Parent cityhost city7.6Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Variance across tracts

How uniformly does eviction risk play out in Walker?

Left: distribution of constituent tract scores. Right: every tract as a heat square. Click any square to drill in.

Score distribution
0246810
Spread of 1.1 points from 8.8 to 9.9. Moderate variation across constituent tracts.
Tracts as heat grid
Each square = one census tract. Color tracks the same green→red ramp as the chloropleth map above.
Census tracts

22 tracts in Walker

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract↕ Score↕ Pop↕ % over 30% on rent↕ Average rent↕
06037533603 9.9 6,407 66% $1,460
06037534102 9.9 5,912 61% $1,582
06037533803 9.9 5,775 60% $1,648
06037533901 9.9 5,083 62% $1,670
06037533602 9.9 4,932 62% $1,383
06037533401 9.9 4,923 44% $1,567
06037533902 9.9 4,454 62% $1,823
06037534406 9.9 4,348 54% $1,578
06037533601 9.9 4,279 52% $1,539
06037533703 9.9 4,241 65% $1,738
06037533504 9.9 4,045 64% $1,469
06037534405 9.9 4,000 72% $1,775
06037533805 9.9 3,816 63% $1,585
06037533402 9.9 3,770 48% $1,267
06037533702 9.9 3,568 53% $1,360
06037534404 9.9 3,244 45% $1,407
06037534101 9.9 1,931 37% $1,472
06037533806 9.8 3,791 64% $1,731
06037533804 9.6 3,524 61% $1,726
06037533701 9.3 3,009 47% $1,381
06037532304 9 4,119 57% $1,375
06037533403 8.8 2,505 57% $1,313
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 89

Pop-weighted across 22 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 93%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 74%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 97%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 65%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Walker

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Walker

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Walker?

Walker scores 9.8/10 (High tier) across 22 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Walker compare to Bell overall?

Walker scores 0.8 points higher than Bell overall (9/10). Renters spend 58% of income on rent vs 40% citywide. Average rent: $1,550 vs $1,575.
Q3

What is the average rent in Walker?

Average gross rent in Walker is $1,550/month (pop-weighted across 22 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Walker residents are renters?

74% of Walker households are renter-occupied (vs 74% in Bell). The neighborhood has 91,676 residents.
Q5

Is Walker a high social-vulnerability area?

Walker sits in the 89th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (highly vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

Which tracts in Walker have the highest eviction risk?

The highest-risk constituent tract in Walker is census tract 06037533603 (score 9.9/10). Across the 22 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 8.8 to 9.9, a spread of 1.1 points.
Q7

How safe is Walker for landlords?

Walker carries a high-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (9.8/10). Pop-weighted across 22 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Bell as a whole (9/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q8

What is the demographic breakdown of Walker?

Walker has 89,998 residents. Top groups: Hispanic / Latino (94.5%), White (non-Hispanic) (3%), Black (non-Hispanic) (1.2%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Walker

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further