Walker Eviction Risk: High
22 census tracts · pop 91,676 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 9.8/10 · range 8.8–9.9
Walker takes in 22 census tracts of Bell, CA and houses 91,676 people. That produces an Eviction Risk Score of 9.8/10, High tier. Against a Bell baseline of 40.3%, 58% of renters here cross the 30%-of-income line.
The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.8/10. The severe-burden share is 31%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay.
Food insecurity affects 39.3% of adults, 21.5 points above the national rate. This is a renter market: 74% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Running cool is supply constraint, at 1.2/10.
26.5% of adults carry no health insurance against 11.3% nationally, a common route into sudden unpayable debt. Sitting well above the midpoint is rent-regulation exposure at 8.3/10. The poverty rate is 21%, which shows up in this model as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
Internally this is not one market. Tract scores span 8.8 to 9.9, so two buildings inside the same boundary can carry materially different risk. Social vulnerability runs high at 9/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input.
Average gross rent runs $1,550, close to the Bell average. Annual rent works out to 32% of average household income of $58,584.
Underwrite the address, not the area: with 1.1 points between its best and worst tract, the per-tract table below is the operative number. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.
Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk
Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Risk heat across Walker and the region
Click any tract to drill in · 22 tracts span score 8.8–9.9
Why Walker scores 9.8
9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendlyWalker vs. parent city, state, U.S.
Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).
How uniformly does eviction risk play out in Walker?
Left: distribution of constituent tract scores. Right: every tract as a heat square. Click any square to drill in.
22 tracts in Walker
Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.
| Tract↕ | Score↕ | Pop↕ | % over 30% on rent↕ | Average rent↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06037533603 | 9.9 | 6,407 | 66% | $1,460 |
| 06037534102 | 9.9 | 5,912 | 61% | $1,582 |
| 06037533803 | 9.9 | 5,775 | 60% | $1,648 |
| 06037533901 | 9.9 | 5,083 | 62% | $1,670 |
| 06037533602 | 9.9 | 4,932 | 62% | $1,383 |
| 06037533401 | 9.9 | 4,923 | 44% | $1,567 |
| 06037533902 | 9.9 | 4,454 | 62% | $1,823 |
| 06037534406 | 9.9 | 4,348 | 54% | $1,578 |
| 06037533601 | 9.9 | 4,279 | 52% | $1,539 |
| 06037533703 | 9.9 | 4,241 | 65% | $1,738 |
| 06037533504 | 9.9 | 4,045 | 64% | $1,469 |
| 06037534405 | 9.9 | 4,000 | 72% | $1,775 |
| 06037533805 | 9.9 | 3,816 | 63% | $1,585 |
| 06037533402 | 9.9 | 3,770 | 48% | $1,267 |
| 06037533702 | 9.9 | 3,568 | 53% | $1,360 |
| 06037534404 | 9.9 | 3,244 | 45% | $1,407 |
| 06037534101 | 9.9 | 1,931 | 37% | $1,472 |
| 06037533806 | 9.8 | 3,791 | 64% | $1,731 |
| 06037533804 | 9.6 | 3,524 | 61% | $1,726 |
| 06037533701 | 9.3 | 3,009 | 47% | $1,381 |
| 06037532304 | 9 | 4,119 | 57% | $1,375 |
| 06037533403 | 8.8 | 2,505 | 57% | $1,313 |
CDC SVI percentile: 89
Pop-weighted across 22 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Walker
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
- 31.9%Housing insecurity
- 13.8%Utility shutoff threat
- 40.0%Food insecurity
- 35.3%SNAP enrollment
- 26.7%No health insurance
- 41.7%Any disability