Cambodia Town Eviction Risk: High , Long Beach
Tract 06037575103 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,980 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Census tract 06037575103 covers part of the Cambodia Town area of Long Beach, CA, and scores 9.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,980 residents. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 9/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Long Beach and the region
Centroid at 33.7862, -118.1535 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cambodia Town scores 9.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Cambodia Town compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 74
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 85%Socioeconomic
- 38%Household composition
- 86%Racial/ethnic minority
- 56%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 100%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Cambodia Town. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 22.8%Housing insecurity
- 10.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 26.6%Food insecurity
- 23.7%SNAP enrollment
- 13.4%Transit barriers
- 13.9%No health insurance
- 19.9%Frequent mental distress
- 32.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Cambodia Town
83% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $63,813, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.
Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10. 19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10.
It sits 1.4 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Cost burden runs 60% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County. Food insecurity runs 26.6% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 23.7% against 15.2% nationally. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
On the national scale it lands near the 97th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037575103
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037575103?
What is the average rent in tract 06037575103?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037575103?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037575103?
Is tract 06037575103 considered part of Cambodia Town?
What share of households in tract 06037575103 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037575103 compare to Long Beach overall?
Was tract 06037575103 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Long Beach
Top eight tracts in Long Beach ranked by composite eviction-risk score.