Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,210 of 84,120 nationally

Cambodia Town Eviction Risk: High , Long Beach

Tract 06037575103 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,980 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 06037575103 covers part of the Cambodia Town area of Long Beach, CA, and scores 9.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,980 residents. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 9/10.

Risk score
9.8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 49% Stable renters 33% Owners 18%
Tract context
Occupied units2,168
Renter share82.8%
SVI overall0.74
Poverty rate13.3%
Median income$63,813

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#25 of 32 tracts In Cambodia Town
Low
Within parent city
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#46 of 112 tracts In Long Beach
Elevated
Within county
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#776 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#1,063 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Long Beach and the region

Centroid at 33.7862, -118.1535 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cambodia Town scores 9.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Long Beach
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
13.3% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,767 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Long Beach
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Long Beach
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Long Beach
8.5

How Cambodia Town compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cambodia Town risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.89.8This tracttract 575103Long Beach: 9.19.1Long Beachparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 74

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cambodia Town. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cambodia Town

83% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $63,813, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10. 19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10.

It sits 1.4 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Cost burden runs 60% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County. Food insecurity runs 26.6% against 17.8% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 23.7% against 15.2% nationally. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

On the national scale it lands near the 97th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037575103

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037575103?

Census tract 06037575103 in the Cambodia Town neighborhood scores 9.8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037575103?

Median gross rent is $1,767/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037575103?

13.3% of residents in tract 06037575103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,980.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037575103?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 74th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 38th, minority 86th, housing 56th.
Q5

Is tract 06037575103 considered part of Cambodia Town?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037575103 fall within Cambodia Town (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037575103 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037575103 compare to Long Beach overall?

Tract 06037575103 scores 9.8/10, higher than the parent city of Long Beach at 9.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Long Beach eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037575103 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 100% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Long Beach

Top eight tracts in Long Beach ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related