Neighborhood · Ranked #5,198 of 84,120 nationally

Belmont Shore Eviction Risk: Elevated , Long Beach

Tract 06037577100 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 7,370 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Eviction risk in the Belmont Shore neighborhood of Long Beach centers on tract 06037577100, which scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 7,370 residents. On the national scale it ranks #10,376 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 46% of renter households, a severe level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,952 a month while the average household earns $95,130 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 73% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score

6.9

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 33% Stable renters 39% Owners 28%

Tract context

Occupied units3,541

Renter share72.6%

SVI overall0.40

Poverty rate12.1%

Median income$95,130

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Long Beach and the region

Centroid at 33.7708, -118.1481 · click any tract to drill in

Why Belmont Shore scores 6.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Long Beach

8.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

12.1% poverty · this tract

3.0

Supply constraint

$1,952 rent vs county FMR

2.4

Rent control risk

Inherited from Long Beach

9.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

8.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Long Beach

8.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from Long Beach

8.5

How Belmont Shore compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 40

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

46%Socioeconomic
4%Household composition
63%Racial/ethnic minority
70%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
60%Grade B
40%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Belmont Shore. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

12.6%Housing insecurity
6.0%Utility-shutoff threat
13.0%Food insecurity
12.1%SNAP enrollment
7.5%Transit barriers
6.6%No health insurance
16.8%Frequent mental distress
26.6%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Belmont Shore

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Long Beach eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037577100

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037577100?

Census tract 06037577100 in the Belmont Shore neighborhood scores 6.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037577100?

Median gross rent is $1,952/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037577100?

12.1% of residents in tract 06037577100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,370.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037577100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 40th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 46th, household 4th, minority 63th, housing 70th.

Is tract 06037577100 considered part of Belmont Shore?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037577100 fall within Belmont Shore (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037577100 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037577100 compare to Long Beach overall?

Tract 06037577100 scores 6.9/10, lower than the parent city of Long Beach at 9.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Long Beach eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037577100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Long Beach

Top eight tracts in Long Beach ranked by composite eviction-risk score.