Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally

Rolling Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Rancho Palos Verdes

Tract 06037670201 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,625 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

06037670201 is a census tract in the Rolling Hills area of Rolling Hills Estates, CA. It scores 5.2/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,625. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 3.2 points.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 10% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,410
Renter share20.3%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate2.0%
Median income$191,063

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Rolling Hills
Low
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Rancho Palos Verdes
Very High
Within county
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#2,467 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#8,324 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rancho Palos Verdes and the region

Centroid at 33.7792, -118.3368 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rolling Hills scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,316 rent vs county FMR
7.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
4.6

How Rolling Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rolling Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.25.2This tracttract 670201Rancho Palos Verde: 6.96.9Rancho Palos Verdeparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rolling Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills

The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. The voucher gap is 26.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Sitting well above the midpoint, supply constraint reads 7.6/10.

Food insecurity runs 6.9% against 17.8% nationally. Running hot, local political climate reads 7.5/10.

Severe burden reaches 9%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

That is riskier than roughly 65% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 20% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037670201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037670201?

Census tract 06037670201 in the Rolling Hills neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037670201?

Median gross rent is $3,316/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037670201?

2.0% of residents in tract 06037670201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,625.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037670201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 49th, minority 52th, housing 19th.
Q5

Is tract 06037670201 considered part of Rolling Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037670201 fall within Rolling Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037670201 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037670201 compare to Rancho Palos Verdes overall?

Tract 06037670201 scores 5.2/10, lower than the parent city of Rancho Palos Verdes at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037670201 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes

Top eight tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related