Rolling Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Rancho Palos Verdes
Tract 06037670201 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,625 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
06037670201 is a census tract in the Rolling Hills area of Rolling Hills Estates, CA. It scores 5.2/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,625. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 3.2 points.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Rancho Palos Verdes and the region
Centroid at 33.7792, -118.3368 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rolling Hills scores 5.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Rolling Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 23
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 20%Socioeconomic
- 49%Household composition
- 52%Racial/ethnic minority
- 19%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Rolling Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.0%Housing insecurity
- 2.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.9%Food insecurity
- 5.5%SNAP enrollment
- 4.2%Transit barriers
- 3.2%No health insurance
- 11.9%Frequent mental distress
- 24.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills
The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. The voucher gap is 26.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Sitting well above the midpoint, supply constraint reads 7.6/10.
Food insecurity runs 6.9% against 17.8% nationally. Running hot, local political climate reads 7.5/10.
Severe burden reaches 9%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
That is riskier than roughly 65% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 20% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037670201
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037670201?
What is the average rent in tract 06037670201?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037670201?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037670201?
Is tract 06037670201 considered part of Rolling Hills?
What share of households in tract 06037670201 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037670201 compare to Rancho Palos Verdes overall?
Was tract 06037670201 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes
Top eight tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes ranked by composite eviction-risk score.