Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,857 of 84,120 nationally

Royal Oaks Eviction Risk: Moderate , Prunedale

Tract 06053010305 · Monterey, CA · pop 4,956 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Census tract 06053010305 sits in the Royal Oaks neighborhood of Prunedale, California. It has a population of 4,956 and an eviction-risk score of 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). 50% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 17% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $2,224/month against a median household income of $123,214 — roughly 22% rent-to-income at the medians.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 10% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,476
Renter share19.3%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate8.4%
Median income$123,214

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank — 100th percentileBottomTop
#1 of 2 tracts In Royal Oaks
Very High
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank — 75th percentileBottomTop
#2 of 5 tracts In Prunedale
High
Within county
32 th percentile
Rank — 32th percentileBottomTop
#70 of 103 tracts In Monterey
Low
Within state
18 th percentile
Rank — 18th percentileBottomTop
#7,460 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Prunedale and the region

Centroid at 36.8192, -121.6753 · click any tract to drill in

Why Royal Oaks scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Prunedale
8.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.4% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$2,224 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Prunedale
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Prunedale
5.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Prunedale
5.6

How Royal Oaks compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Royal Oaks risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 010305Prunedale: 5.25.2Prunedaleparent cityCounty: 5.65.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 6.16.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 47

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Royal Oaks. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Frequently asked

About tract 06053010305

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06053010305?

Census tract 06053010305 in the Royal Oaks neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06053010305?

Median gross rent is $2,224/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06053010305?

8.4% of residents in tract 06053010305 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,956.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06053010305?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 59th, minority 71th, housing 31th.

Q5

Is tract 06053010305 considered part of Royal Oaks?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06053010305 fall within Royal Oaks (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).

Q6

What share of households in tract 06053010305 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.1% also reported utility shutoff threats — a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

Q7

How does tract 06053010305 compare to Prunedale overall?

Tract 06053010305 scores 5.4/10 — right in line with the parent city of Prunedale at 5.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Prunedale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Prunedale

Top eight tracts in Prunedale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related