Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally
Acacia Knolls Eviction Risk: Lower , Laguna Hills
Tract 06059032015 · Orange, CA · pop 6,564 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
In Acacia Knolls in Laguna Hills, census tract 06059032015 scores 5.1/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than about 44% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 32% of renter households, a high level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,494 a month while the average household earns $169,543 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 12% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 8%
Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,949
Renter share12.4%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate5.6%
Median income$169,543
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
45
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
5
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
3
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Laguna Hills and the region
Centroid at 33.6092, -117.6853 · click any tract to drill in
Why Acacia Knolls scores 2.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Laguna Hills
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.6% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$2,494 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Laguna Hills
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Laguna Hills
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Laguna Hills
5.7
How Acacia Knolls compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 31
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 20%Socioeconomic
- 73%Household composition
- 61%Racial/ethnic minority
- 21%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Acacia Knolls. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.0%Housing insecurity
- 5.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.0%Food insecurity
- 10.0%SNAP enrollment
- 6.6%Transit barriers
- 7.0%No health insurance
- 15.6%Frequent mental distress
- 28.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Acacia Knolls
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Laguna Hills, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Orange County average of 5.7 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 31st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 10.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06059032015
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059032015?
Census tract 06059032015 in the Acacia Knolls neighborhood scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06059032015?
Median gross rent is $2,494/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06059032015?
5.6% of residents in tract 06059032015 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,564.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06059032015?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 73th, minority 61th, housing 21th.
Q5
Is tract 06059032015 considered part of Acacia Knolls?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059032015 fall within Acacia Knolls (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06059032015 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06059032015 compare to Laguna Hills overall?
Tract 06059032015 scores 2.5/10, lower than the parent city of Laguna Hills at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Laguna Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Laguna Hills
Top eight tracts in Laguna Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related