Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,578 of 84,120 nationally

Lincoln/Glassell Eviction Risk: Moderate , Anaheim

Tract 06059086305 · Orange, CA · pop 4,691 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

The Moderate-tier score of 5.8/10 for census tract 06059086305 reflects conditions in Lincoln/Glassell in Anaheim, California. That is riskier than about 70% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 52% of renter households, a severe level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $3,501 monthly, set against $150,341 in average yearly household income, roughly 28% of income at the averages. About 14% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 7% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,133
Renter share13.7%
SVI overall0.50
Poverty rate4.5%
Median income$150,341

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Lincoln/Glassell
Low
Within parent city
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#56 of 61 tracts In Anaheim
Very Low
Within county
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#290 of 613 tracts In Orange
Moderate
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#6,078 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Anaheim and the region

Centroid at 33.8291, -117.8795 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lincoln/Glassell scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Anaheim
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.5% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
7.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Anaheim
6.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Anaheim
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Anaheim
7.0

How Lincoln/Glassell compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lincoln/Glassell risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.74.7This tracttract 086305Anaheim: 8.08.0Anaheimparent cityCounty: 4.64.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 50

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lincoln/Glassell. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lincoln/Glassell

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 7.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Anaheim eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Orange County average of 5.7 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 13.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 50th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06059086305

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059086305?

Census tract 06059086305 in the Lincoln/Glassell neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06059086305?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06059086305?

4.5% of residents in tract 06059086305 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,691.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06059086305?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 50th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 29th, minority 81th, housing 38th.
Q5

Is tract 06059086305 considered part of Lincoln/Glassell?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059086305 fall within Lincoln/Glassell (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06059086305 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06059086305 compare to Anaheim overall?

Tract 06059086305 scores 4.7/10, lower than the parent city of Anaheim at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Anaheim eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Anaheim

Top eight tracts in Anaheim ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related