Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,456 of 84,120 nationally

Lincoln/Glassell Eviction Risk: Elevated , Anaheim

Tract 06059086406 · Orange, CA · pop 4,164 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Here is how census tract 06059086406, in Lincoln/Glassell in Anaheim eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 5.8/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 4,164. That is riskier than about 70% of US census tracts.

71% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 36% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,956 a month against an average household income of $76,602 a year, roughly 31% of income at the averages. Renters make up 67% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.5
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 47% Stable renters 19% Owners 34%
Tract context
Occupied units1,233
Renter share66.7%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate14.1%
Median income$76,602

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 tracts In Lincoln/Glassell
Very High
Within parent city
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#23 of 61 tracts In Anaheim
Elevated
Within county
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#63 of 613 tracts In Orange
High
Within state
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#2,892 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Anaheim and the region

Centroid at 33.8438, -117.8762 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lincoln/Glassell scores 6.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Anaheim
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
14.1% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$1,956 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Anaheim
6.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Anaheim
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Anaheim
7.0

How Lincoln/Glassell compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lincoln/Glassell risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.56.5This tracttract 086406Anaheim: 8.08.0Anaheimparent cityCounty: 4.64.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lincoln/Glassell. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lincoln/Glassell

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Anaheim eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Orange County average of 5.7 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 82nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 19.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06059086406

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059086406?

Census tract 06059086406 in the Lincoln/Glassell neighborhood scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06059086406?

Median gross rent is $1,956/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 71% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06059086406?

14.1% of residents in tract 06059086406 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,164.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06059086406?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 72th, household 38th, minority 88th, housing 94th.
Q5

Is tract 06059086406 considered part of Lincoln/Glassell?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059086406 fall within Lincoln/Glassell (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06059086406 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06059086406 compare to Anaheim overall?

Tract 06059086406 scores 6.5/10, lower than the parent city of Anaheim at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Anaheim eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Anaheim

Top eight tracts in Anaheim ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related