Tract 06059089102 ·
Orange, CA · pop 6,289 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Census tract 06059089102 covers part of the Mar-Les area of Garden Grove, CA, and scores 8.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Against Orange County at 51.8%, around two-thirds of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
8.3
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24%Stable renters 12%Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units1,710
Renter share36.1%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate15.8%
Median income$96,765
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
15th percentile
#12 of 14 tracts In Mar-Les
Very Low
Within parent city
59th percentile
#14 of 33 tracts In Santa Ana
Elevated
Within county
78th percentile
#133 of 613 tracts In Orange
High
Within state
66th percentile
#3,143 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Santa Ana and the region
Centroid at 33.7637, -117.9089 · click any tract to drill in
Why Mar-Les scores 8.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Santa Ana
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.8% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$2,065 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Santa Ana
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Santa Ana
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Santa Ana
7.1
How Mar-Les compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 81
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
21.2%Housing insecurity
9.9%Utility-shutoff threat
28.1%Food insecurity
22.3%SNAP enrollment
12.9%Transit barriers
17.7%No health insurance
17.9%Frequent mental distress
34.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Mar-Les
The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 8.9/10. 23% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.2/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.1/10. It sits 1.3 points above the Orange County average of 7.0.
Food insecurity runs 28.1% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 22.3% against 15.2% nationally.
That is riskier than roughly 92% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 8.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.8 points hotter.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06059089102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059089102?
Census tract 06059089102 in the Mar-Les neighborhood scores 8.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06059089102?
Median gross rent is $2,065/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06059089102?
15.8% of residents in tract 06059089102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,289.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06059089102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 28th, minority 87th, housing 95th.
Q5
Is tract 06059089102 considered part of Mar-Les?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059089102 fall within Mar-Les (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06059089102 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06059089102 compare to Santa Ana overall?
Tract 06059089102 scores 8.3/10, lower than the parent city of Santa Ana at 8.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Santa Ana eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Santa Ana
Top eight tracts in Santa Ana ranked by composite eviction-risk score.