Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #21,564 of 84,120 nationally

Roseville Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 06061021034 · Placer, CA · pop 4,375

With a score of 5.7/10, tract 06061021034 in Roseville, CA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Against Placer County at 50.5%, roughly one in three of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 10% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,447
Renter share14.8%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate0.6%
Median income$148,406

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#27 of 31 tracts In Roseville
Very Low
Within county
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#61 of 92 tracts In Placer
Low
Within state
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#7,527 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
National
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#21,564 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Roseville and the region

Centroid at 38.7839, -121.2991 · click any tract to drill in

Why Roseville scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Roseville
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
0.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,810 rent vs county FMR
7.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Roseville
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Roseville
6.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Roseville
5.6

How Roseville compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Roseville risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 021034Roseville: 6.66.6Rosevilleparent cityCounty: 6.26.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 9

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Roseville

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Average gross rent is $2,810, 31% above the Roseville average.

The voucher gap is 27.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Well under the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 2.2/10. On the high side, supply constraint reads 7.7/10.

Food insecurity runs 7.5% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 5.9% against 15.2% nationally.

The severe-burden share is 9%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. That is riskier than roughly 74% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 15% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 1.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.8 points cooler.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 1%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the Placer County average of 6.2 closely.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06061021034

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06061021034?

Census tract 06061021034 in Roseville scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06061021034?

Median gross rent is $2,810/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06061021034?

0.6% of residents in tract 06061021034 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,375.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06061021034?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 71th, minority 46th, housing 2th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06061021034 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06061021034 compare to Roseville overall?

Tract 06061021034 scores 5.7/10, lower than the parent city of Roseville at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Roseville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Roseville

Top eight tracts in Roseville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related