Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #22,681 of 84,120 nationally

Roseville Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 06061021328 · Placer, CA · pop 9,754 · 50% of tract blocks fall in Roseville

With a score of 5.6/10, tract 06061021328 in Roseville, CA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 9,754. Cost burden runs 13% here against 50.5% across Placer County.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 5% Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units3,206
Renter share5.4%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate2.4%
Median income$174,815

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#29 of 31 tracts In Roseville
Very Low
Within county
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#65 of 92 tracts In Placer
Low
Within state
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#7,670 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
National
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#22,681 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Roseville and the region

Centroid at 38.8804, -121.4052 · click any tract to drill in

Why Roseville scores 5.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Roseville
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,594 rent vs county FMR
6.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Roseville
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Roseville
6.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Roseville
5.6

How Roseville compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Roseville risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.65.6This tracttract 021328Roseville: 6.66.6Rosevilleparent cityCounty: 6.26.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 7

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Roseville

The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 2.2/10.

At $2,594 a month, rents run 21% over what the rest of Roseville commands. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.6/10. The voucher gap is 17.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Food insecurity runs 9.3% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 7.6% against 15.2% nationally. It sits 0.6 points below the Placer County average of 6.2.

On the national scale it lands near the 73rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 5% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.7/10. Rent consumes only 18% of average household income of $174,815, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.9 points cooler.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06061021328

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06061021328?

Census tract 06061021328 in Roseville scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06061021328?

Median gross rent is $2,594/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 13% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06061021328?

2.4% of residents in tract 06061021328 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 9,754.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06061021328?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 34th, minority 64th, housing 4th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06061021328 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06061021328 compare to Roseville overall?

Tract 06061021328 scores 5.6/10, lower than the parent city of Roseville at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Roseville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Roseville

Top eight tracts in Roseville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related