Tract 06065044507 ·
Riverside, CA · pop 7,212 · 63% of tract blocks fall in Desert Hot Springs
With a score of 8.6/10, tract 06065044507 in Desert Hot Springs, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 7,212 residents. Against Riverside County at 53.8%, 35% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
8.6
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14%Stable renters 26%Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units2,450
Renter share40.4%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate14.5%
Median income$63,249
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
33th percentile
#5 of 7 tracts In Desert Hot Springs
Low
Within county
99th percentile
#9 of 518 tracts In Riverside
Very High
Within state
74th percentile
#2,397 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
National
94th percentile
#5,153 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Desert Hot Springs and the region
Centroid at 33.9473, -116.5282 · click any tract to drill in
Why Desert Hot Springs scores 8.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Desert Hot Springs
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
14.5% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,421 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Desert Hot Springs
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Desert Hot Springs
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Desert Hot Springs
8.4
How Desert Hot Springs compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 98
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
26.3%Housing insecurity
12.9%Utility-shutoff threat
31.6%Food insecurity
27.3%SNAP enrollment
15.2%Transit barriers
19.9%No health insurance
20.0%Frequent mental distress
40.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Desert Hot Springs
The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.1/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 9/10. Severe burden reaches 24%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Against the Riverside County average of 6.6, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.2/10. Housing insecurity runs 26.3% against 14.2% nationally.
Adults with no health insurance runs 19.9% against 11.3% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 94% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 9.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.1 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $1,421, close to the Desert Hot Springs average.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06065044507
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065044507?
Census tract 06065044507 in Desert Hot Springs scores 8.6/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06065044507?
Median gross rent is $1,421/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06065044507?
14.5% of residents in tract 06065044507 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,212.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06065044507?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 90th, minority 88th, housing 92th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06065044507 struggle to pay rent?
About 26.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06065044507 compare to Desert Hot Springs overall?
Tract 06065044507 scores 8.6/10, higher than the parent city of Desert Hot Springs at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Desert Hot Springs; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Desert Hot Springs
Top eight tracts in Desert Hot Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.