Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #4,888 of 84,120 nationally
Good Hope Eviction Risk: High
Tract 06065042902 · Riverside, CA · pop 4,334 · 44% of tract blocks fall in Good Hope
Census tract 06065042902 covers part of Good Hope, CA, and scores 8.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,334. 32% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
8.7
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30%
Stable renters 18%
Owners 52%
Tract context
Occupied units1,360
Renter share48.2%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate26.9%
Median income$53,704
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
99
th percentile
Very High
Within state
75
th percentile
High
National
94
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Good Hope and the region
Centroid at 33.7493, -117.3068 · click any tract to drill in
Why Good Hope scores 8.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Good Hope
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
26.9% poverty · this tract
6.7
Supply constraint
$1,474 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Good Hope
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Good Hope
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Good Hope
8.9
How Good Hope compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 88%Socioeconomic
- 90%Household composition
- 88%Racial/ethnic minority
- 89%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 27.2%Housing insecurity
- 13.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 34.2%Food insecurity
- 29.8%SNAP enrollment
- 16.1%Transit barriers
- 22.3%No health insurance
- 19.9%Frequent mental distress
- 43.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Good Hope
The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.1/10. On the high side, housing-court posture reads 8.9/10.
It sits 2.1 points above the Riverside County average of 6.6. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.8/10. Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $53,704, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.
Food insecurity runs 34.2% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 29.8% against 15.2% nationally. The poverty rate is 27%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
Against Riverside County at 53.8%, 62% of renters here are cost-burdened. That is riskier than roughly 94% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 9.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06065042902
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065042902?
Census tract 06065042902 in Good Hope scores 8.7/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06065042902?
Median gross rent is $1,474/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06065042902?
26.9% of residents in tract 06065042902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,334.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06065042902?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 90th, minority 88th, housing 89th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06065042902 struggle to pay rent?
About 27.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06065042902 compare to Good Hope overall?
Tract 06065042902 scores 8.7/10, higher than the parent city of Good Hope at 7.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Good Hope; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Good Hope
Top eight tracts in Good Hope ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related