Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #54,934 of 84,120 nationally
Natoma Station Eviction Risk: Lower , Folsom
Tract 06067008504 · Sacramento, CA · pop 5,304 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Tract 06067008504 covers the Natoma Station area of Folsom in California. Home to 5,304 residents, it scores $1/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 76% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 48% of renter households, a severe level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,501 monthly, set against $111,975 in average yearly household income, roughly 27% of income at the averages. Renters make up 39% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%
Stable renters 20%
Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units2,151
Renter share38.8%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate8.1%
Median income$111,975
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
73
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
8
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
10
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Folsom and the region
Centroid at 38.6530, -121.1798 · click any tract to drill in
Why Natoma Station scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Folsom
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.1% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$2,501 rent vs county FMR
6.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Folsom
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Folsom
6.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Folsom
4.5
How Natoma Station compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 24
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 19%Socioeconomic
- 40%Household composition
- 56%Racial/ethnic minority
- 25%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.6%Housing insecurity
- 4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.9%Food insecurity
- 8.0%SNAP enrollment
- 5.8%Transit barriers
- 4.4%No health insurance
- 15.6%Frequent mental distress
- 22.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Natoma Station
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 3.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Folsom, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 24th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067008504
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067008504?
Census tract 06067008504 in the Natoma Station neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067008504?
Median gross rent is $2,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067008504?
8.1% of residents in tract 06067008504 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,304.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067008504?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 40th, minority 56th, housing 25th.
Q5
Is tract 06067008504 considered part of Natoma Station?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067008504 fall within Natoma Station (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06067008504 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06067008504 compare to Folsom overall?
Tract 06067008504 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Folsom at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Folsom; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Folsom
Top eight tracts in Folsom ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Old Town Folsom
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Lexington Hills
4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Represa
3.3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Old Town Folsom
3.2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Prairie Oaks
3.1
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Prairie Oaks
2.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Willow Springs
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Empire Ranch
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Related