Carmichael Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 06067008913 · Sacramento, CA · pop 4,426 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
In the Carmichael area of Carmichael, census tract 06067008913 scores 5.7/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 66% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
44% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,295 a month while the average household earns $75,208 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 49% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Carmichael and the region
Centroid at 38.6081, -121.3046 · click any tract to drill in
Why Carmichael scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Carmichael compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 71
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 67%Socioeconomic
- 71%Household composition
- 51%Racial/ethnic minority
- 66%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Carmichael. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 14.5%Housing insecurity
- 8.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 16.6%Food insecurity
- 18.4%SNAP enrollment
- 10.0%Transit barriers
- 8.2%No health insurance
- 19.6%Frequent mental distress
- 34.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Carmichael
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Carmichael, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 71st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 14.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 06067008913
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067008913?
What is the average rent in tract 06067008913?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067008913?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067008913?
Is tract 06067008913 considered part of Carmichael?
What share of households in tract 06067008913 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06067008913 compare to Carmichael overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Carmichael
Top eight tracts in Carmichael ranked by composite eviction-risk score.