Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,451 of 84,120 nationally

Mid-City Eviction Risk: Elevated , San Diego

Tract 06073014702 · San Diego, CA · pop 4,124 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

06073014702 is a census tract in the Mid-City area of La Mesa, CA. It scores 6.5/10 for landlords. Population here is 4,124. The severe-burden share is 38%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
6.5
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 5% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,637
Renter share20.4%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate2.1%
Median income$115,790

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Mid-City
Very Low
Within parent city
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 14 tracts In San Diego
Very Low
Within county
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#562 of 736 tracts In San Diego
Low
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#6,120 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Diego and the region

Centroid at 32.7599, -117.0459 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mid-City scores 6.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Diego
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,325 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Diego
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Diego
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Diego
7.1

How Mid-City compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mid-City risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.56.5This tracttract 014702San Diego: 8.68.6San Diegoparent cityCounty: 7.67.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mid-City. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mid-City

Against San Diego County at 52.5%, 75% of renters here are cost-burdened. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.4/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10.

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. It sits 1.1 points below the San Diego County average of 7.6.

At $2,325 a month, rents run 13% over what the rest of La Mesa commands. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Diego. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 82% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 20% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 5.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler.

Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06073014702

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06073014702?

Census tract 06073014702 in the Mid-City neighborhood scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06073014702?

Median gross rent is $2,325/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 75% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06073014702?

2.1% of residents in tract 06073014702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,124.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06073014702?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 32th, household 72th, minority 60th, housing 54th.
Q5

Is tract 06073014702 considered part of Mid-City?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06073014702 fall within Mid-City (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06073014702 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06073014702 compare to San Diego overall?

Tract 06073014702 scores 6.5/10, lower than the parent city of San Diego at 8.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Diego eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06073014702 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Diego

Top eight tracts in San Diego ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related