Laurel Heights Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075015402 · San Francisco, CA · pop 2,848 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
06075015402 is a census tract in the Laurel Heights area of San Francisco, CA. It scores 8.8/10 for landlords. Against San Francisco County at 37.3%, 20% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7856, -122.4514 · click any tract to drill in
Why Laurel Heights scores 8.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Laurel Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 2
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 1%Socioeconomic
- 0%Household composition
- 53%Racial/ethnic minority
- 41%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 35%Grade C
- 17%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Laurel Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.6%Housing insecurity
- 3.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.2%Food insecurity
- 3.8%SNAP enrollment
- 3.8%Transit barriers
- 3.1%No health insurance
- 13.5%Frequent mental distress
- 17.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Laurel Heights
The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10.
76% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. 10% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Housing insecurity runs 5.6% against 14.2% nationally.
Adults with no health insurance runs 3.1% against 11.3% nationally. At $2,837 a month, rents run 15% over what the rest of San Francisco commands. It sits 0.7 points below the San Francisco County average of 9.5.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 95th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06075015402
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075015402?
What is the average rent in tract 06075015402?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075015402?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075015402?
Is tract 06075015402 considered part of Laurel Heights?
What share of households in tract 06075015402 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075015402 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075015402 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.