Seacliff Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075980300 · San Francisco, CA · pop 38 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
Tract 06075980300 sits in the Seacliff area of San Francisco eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. Cost burden runs 8% here against 37.3% across San Francisco County.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7684, -122.4921 · click any tract to drill in
Why Seacliff scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Seacliff compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 7%Socioeconomic
- 0%Household composition
- 54%Racial/ethnic minority
- 31%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Seacliff. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.3%Housing insecurity
- 4.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.6%Food insecurity
- 6.3%SNAP enrollment
- 5.6%Transit barriers
- 5.6%No health insurance
- 13.9%Frequent mental distress
- 19.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Seacliff
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10.
100% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. Food insecurity runs 8.6% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 6.3% against 15.2% nationally. Average gross rent is $2,233, 10% below the San Francisco average.
This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 1.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06075980300
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075980300?
What is the average rent in tract 06075980300?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075980300?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075980300?
Is tract 06075980300 considered part of Seacliff?
What share of households in tract 06075980300 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075980300 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075980300 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.