Diamond Heights Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075021600 · San Francisco, CA · pop 4,414 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Census tract 06075021600 covers part of the Diamond Heights area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 8.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7455, -122.4381 · click any tract to drill in
Why Diamond Heights scores 8.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Diamond Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 9
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 0%Socioeconomic
- 13%Household composition
- 65%Racial/ethnic minority
- 41%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 26%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Diamond Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.8%Housing insecurity
- 3.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.7%Food insecurity
- 4.1%SNAP enrollment
- 3.9%Transit barriers
- 3.5%No health insurance
- 11.9%Frequent mental distress
- 19.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Diamond Heights
On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. 26% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the San Francisco County average of 37.3%.
Average gross rent is $3,229, 30% above the San Francisco average. Disability prevalence runs 19.1% against 31.5% nationally. Food insecurity runs 5.7% against 17.8% nationally.
It sits 0.8 points below the San Francisco County average of 9.5. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #4,888 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $237,909, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06075021600
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075021600?
What is the average rent in tract 06075021600?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075021600?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075021600?
Is tract 06075021600 considered part of Diamond Heights?
What share of households in tract 06075021600 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075021600 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075021600 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.