Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Little Hollywood Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075023400 · San Francisco, CA · pop 4,039 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 06075023400 covers part of the Little Hollywood area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,039 residents. The severe-burden share is 56%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 9% Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units1,169
Renter share44.5%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate25.6%
Median income$80,788

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Little Hollywood
Very High
Within parent city
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#77 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Elevated
Within county
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#33 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7216, -122.3901 · click any tract to drill in

Why Little Hollywood scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
25.6% poverty · this tract
6.4
Supply constraint
$1,370 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How Little Hollywood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Little Hollywood risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.9This tracttract 0234009.9San Franciscoparent city9.5Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Little Hollywood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Little Hollywood

Against San Francisco County at 37.3%, 79% of renters here are cost-burdened. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

At $1,370 a month, rents run 45% under what the rest of San Francisco commands. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10.

Food insecurity runs 35.5% against 17.8% nationally. The poverty rate is 26%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 15.2% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.1/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. It tracks the San Francisco County average of 9.5 closely.

Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $80,788.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075023400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075023400?

Census tract 06075023400 in the Little Hollywood neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075023400?

Median gross rent is $1,370/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 79% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075023400?

25.6% of residents in tract 06075023400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,039.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075023400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 72th, household 99th, minority 92th, housing 67th.
Q5

Is tract 06075023400 considered part of Little Hollywood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075023400 fall within Little Hollywood (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075023400 struggle to pay rent?

About 25.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075023400 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075023400 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06075023400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 37% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related