Seacliff Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10.

74% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. around a third of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the San Francisco County average of 37.3%.

10% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Food insecurity runs 8.9% against 17.8% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 6.7% against 15.2% nationally. At $2,251 a month, rents run 9% under what the rest of San Francisco commands. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.