Duboce Triangle Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075020802 ·
San Francisco, CA · pop 2,523 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Census tract 06075020802 covers part of the Duboce Triangle area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31%Stable renters 52%Owners 17%
Tract context
Occupied units1,114
Renter share82.6%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate15.0%
Median income$117,000
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
85th percentile
#3 of 14 tracts In Duboce Triangle
High
Within parent city
99th percentile
#4 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very High
Within county
97th percentile
#8 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very High
Within state
100th percentile
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7618, -122.4194 · click any tract to drill in
Why Duboce Triangle scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.0% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,913 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5
How Duboce Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 62
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
62%Socioeconomic
13%Household composition
71%Racial/ethnic minority
83%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Duboce Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
15.4%Housing insecurity
7.6%Utility-shutoff threat
18.8%Food insecurity
15.0%SNAP enrollment
9.8%Transit barriers
13.0%No health insurance
16.5%Frequent mental distress
27.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Duboce Triangle
Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. This is renter territory: 83% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.
The severe-burden share is 18%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Average gross rent is $1,913, 23% below the San Francisco average.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.6/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Rent takes 30% or more of income for 38% of renters.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06075020802
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075020802?
Census tract 06075020802 in the Duboce Triangle neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06075020802?
Median gross rent is $1,913/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075020802?
15.0% of residents in tract 06075020802 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,523.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075020802?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 13th, minority 71th, housing 83th.
Q5
Is tract 06075020802 considered part of Duboce Triangle?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075020802 fall within Duboce Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06075020802 struggle to pay rent?
About 15.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06075020802 compare to San Francisco overall?
Tract 06075020802 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06075020802 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.