Country Club Eviction Risk: Elevated

Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the high side, housing-court posture reads 7.4/10. The poverty rate is 21%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

It sits 1.0 points above the San Joaquin County average of 6.8. Cost burden runs 52% here against 47.9% across San Joaquin County.

The voucher gap is 12.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 89% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. The legal-climate inputs (statute speed, court posture, rent-regulation exposure) come from Country Club as a whole. Only the economic and supply signals are measured inside this tract.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.7/10. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

Average gross rent is $1,946, close to the Country Club average. Annual rent works out to 29% of average household income of $80,577.

37% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.