Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,278 of 84,120 nationally
Sequoia Tract Eviction Risk: Moderate , Redwood City
Tract 06081611400 · San Mateo, CA · pop 4,251 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
With a score of 4.9/10, tract 06081611400 in the Sequoia Tract area of Atherton, CA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,251. Cost burden runs 16% here against 44.9% across San Mateo County.
Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%
Stable renters 14%
Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units1,319
Renter share16.1%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate3.9%
Median income$250,001
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
4
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
4
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Redwood City and the region
Centroid at 37.4463, -122.2148 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sequoia Tract scores 4.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Redwood City
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.9
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Redwood City
1.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Redwood City
3.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Redwood City
2.1
How Sequoia Tract compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 7
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 2%Socioeconomic
- 17%Household composition
- 51%Racial/ethnic minority
- 19%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Sequoia Tract. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.9%Housing insecurity
- 2.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.8%Food insecurity
- 4.0%SNAP enrollment
- 4.2%Transit barriers
- 3.1%No health insurance
- 12.4%Frequent mental distress
- 23.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Sequoia Tract
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. It sits 2.1 points below the San Mateo County average of 7.0. Running cool, court filing pressure reads 1.4/10.
On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.7/10. SNAP participation runs 4.0% against 15.2% nationally.
The severe-burden share is 12%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Housing insecurity runs 4.9% against 14.2% nationally.
On the national scale it lands near the 59th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 16% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $250,001, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06081611400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06081611400?
Census tract 06081611400 in the Sequoia Tract neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06081611400?
Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 16% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06081611400?
3.9% of residents in tract 06081611400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,251.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06081611400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 17th, minority 51th, housing 19th.
Q5
Is tract 06081611400 considered part of Sequoia Tract?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06081611400 fall within Sequoia Tract (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06081611400 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06081611400 compare to Redwood City overall?
Tract 06081611400 scores 4.9/10, lower than the parent city of Redwood City at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redwood City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Redwood City
Top eight tracts in Redwood City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related