Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #73,892 of 84,120 nationally

Sequoia Tract Eviction Risk: Lower , Redwood City

Tract 06081613300 · San Mateo, CA · pop 2,734 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

Census tract 06081613300 covers the Sequoia Tract area of Redwood City, home to 2,734 residents. For landlords it grades 5.1/10, a moderate reading. That is riskier than roughly 43% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 42% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $3,501 monthly, set against $250,001 in average yearly household income, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 10% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 6% Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units896
Renter share10.2%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate4.2%
Median income$250,001

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Sequoia Tract
Low
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Redwood City
Very High
Within county
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#156 of 173 tracts In San Mateo
Very Low
Within state
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#8,991 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Redwood City and the region

Centroid at 37.4407, -122.2490 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sequoia Tract scores 2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Redwood City
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.9
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Redwood City
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Redwood City
3.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Redwood City
5.1

How Sequoia Tract compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sequoia Tract risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.02.0This tracttract 613300Redwood City: 8.28.2Redwood Cityparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 3

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Sequoia Tract. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sequoia Tract

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 7.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Redwood City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the San Mateo County average of 5.1 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 3rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 5.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06081613300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06081613300?

Census tract 06081613300 in the Sequoia Tract neighborhood scores 2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06081613300?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06081613300?

4.2% of residents in tract 06081613300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,734.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06081613300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 23th, minority 43th, housing 3th.
Q5

Is tract 06081613300 considered part of Sequoia Tract?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06081613300 fall within Sequoia Tract (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06081613300 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06081613300 compare to Redwood City overall?

Tract 06081613300 scores 2/10, lower than the parent city of Redwood City at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redwood City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Redwood City

Top eight tracts in Redwood City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related