Within neighborhood
25
th percentile
Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #20,506 of 84,120 nationally
Sequoia Tract Eviction Risk: Moderate , Redwood City
Tract 06081613300 · San Mateo, CA · pop 2,734 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi
With a score of 5.8/10, tract 06081613300 in the Sequoia Tract area of Woodside, CA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,734. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10.
Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 6%
Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units896
Renter share10.2%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate4.2%
Median income$250,001
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
6
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
19
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Redwood City and the region
Centroid at 37.4407, -122.2490 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sequoia Tract scores 5.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Redwood City
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.9
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Redwood City
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Redwood City
3.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Redwood City
5.1
How Sequoia Tract compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 3%Socioeconomic
- 23%Household composition
- 43%Racial/ethnic minority
- 3%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Sequoia Tract. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.3%Housing insecurity
- 3.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.8%Food insecurity
- 4.6%SNAP enrollment
- 4.0%Transit barriers
- 3.0%No health insurance
- 12.5%Frequent mental distress
- 23.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Sequoia Tract
On the softer side, court filing pressure reads 1.4/10. The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.1/10.
Against the San Mateo County average of 7.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.2 points. Housing insecurity runs 5.3% against 14.2% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.0% against 11.3% nationally.
On the national scale it lands near the 76th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 10% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Against average income of $250,001, annual rent is just 17%. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.7 points cooler.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06081613300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06081613300?
Census tract 06081613300 in the Sequoia Tract neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06081613300?
Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06081613300?
4.2% of residents in tract 06081613300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,734.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06081613300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 23th, minority 43th, housing 3th.
Q5
Is tract 06081613300 considered part of Sequoia Tract?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06081613300 fall within Sequoia Tract (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06081613300 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06081613300 compare to Redwood City overall?
Tract 06081613300 scores 5.8/10, lower than the parent city of Redwood City at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redwood City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Redwood City
Top eight tracts in Redwood City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related