Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally

Notting Hill - Royal Crest Eviction Risk: Lower , San Jose

Tract 06085504316 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 5,410 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 06085504316 covers Notting Hill - Royal Crest in San Jose, home to 5,410 residents. For landlords it grades 6.1/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than roughly 79% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 54% of renter households, a severe level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $3,501 a month while the average household earns $188,098 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 25% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 11% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,499
Renter share24.9%
SVI overall0.35
Poverty rate4.2%
Median income$188,098

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 8 tracts In Notting Hill - Royal Crest
Very Low
Within parent city
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#185 of 216 tracts In San Jose
Very Low
Within county
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#235 of 408 tracts In Santa Clara
Moderate
Within state
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#7,309 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Jose and the region

Centroid at 37.3869, -121.8708 · click any tract to drill in

Why Notting Hill - Royal Crest scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Jose
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Jose
8.5

How Notting Hill - Royal Crest compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Notting Hill - Royal Crest risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 504316San Jose: 9.29.2San Joseparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 35

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Notting Hill - Royal Crest. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Notting Hill - Royal Crest

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 9.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from San Jose eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Santa Clara County average of 5.4 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Asian and ranks around the 35th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06085504316

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085504316?

Census tract 06085504316 in the Notting Hill - Royal Crest neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06085504316?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06085504316?

4.2% of residents in tract 06085504316 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,410.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06085504316?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 20th, minority 93th, housing 45th.
Q5

Is tract 06085504316 considered part of Notting Hill - Royal Crest?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085504316 fall within Notting Hill - Royal Crest (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06085504316 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06085504316 compare to San Jose overall?

Tract 06085504316 scores 3.8/10, lower than the parent city of San Jose at 9.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Jose eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Jose

Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related