Neighborhood · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally

Notting Hill - Royal Crest Eviction Risk: Lower , San Jose

Tract 06085504317 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 3,763 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

How risky is the Notting Hill - Royal Crest neighborhood of San Jose for landlords? Census tract 06085504317 scores 4.9/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 36% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 9% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $3,501 a month while the average household earns $175,515 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 23% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score

3.8

Lower

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 21% Owners 77%

Tract context

Occupied units1,049

Renter share23.4%

SVI overall0.39

Poverty rate3.5%

Median income$175,515

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across San Jose and the region

Centroid at 37.3829, -121.8767 · click any tract to drill in

Why Notting Hill - Royal Crest scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from San Jose

8.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.4

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

3.5% poverty · this tract

1.0

Supply constraint

$3,501 rent vs county FMR

5.2

Rent control risk

Inherited from San Jose

9.5

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

9.0

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from San Jose

8.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from San Jose

8.5

How Notting Hill - Royal Crest compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

12%Socioeconomic
40%Household composition
91%Racial/ethnic minority
65%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Notting Hill - Royal Crest. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

8.5%Housing insecurity
3.6%Utility-shutoff threat
11.6%Food insecurity
7.4%SNAP enrollment
5.8%Transit barriers
5.8%No health insurance
12.0%Frequent mental distress
22.5%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Notting Hill - Royal Crest

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 9.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from San Jose eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Santa Clara County average of 5.4 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Asian and ranks around the 39th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06085504317

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085504317?

Census tract 06085504317 in the Notting Hill - Royal Crest neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06085504317?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 9% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06085504317?

3.5% of residents in tract 06085504317 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,763.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06085504317?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 40th, minority 91th, housing 65th.

Is tract 06085504317 considered part of Notting Hill - Royal Crest?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085504317 fall within Notting Hill - Royal Crest (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06085504317 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06085504317 compare to San Jose overall?

Tract 06085504317 scores 3.8/10, lower than the parent city of San Jose at 9.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Jose eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Jose

Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.