Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,198 of 84,120 nationally

Heritage Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Lindsay

Tract 06107002500 · Tulare, CA · pop 3,736 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

How risky is Heritage Park in Lindsay for landlords? Census tract 06107002500 scores 6.2/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 81% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 43% of renter households, a severe level, and 43% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,278 monthly, set against $85,038 in average yearly household income, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 30% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
6.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 17% Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units1,101
Renter share30.1%
SVI overall0.74
Poverty rate19.9%
Median income$85,038

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Heritage Park
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Lindsay
Very Low
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#56 of 103 tracts In Tulare
Moderate
Within state
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2,277 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lindsay and the region

Centroid at 36.2049, -119.1293 · click any tract to drill in

Why Heritage Park scores 6.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lindsay
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
19.9% poverty · this tract
5.0
Supply constraint
$1,278 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lindsay
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lindsay
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lindsay
8.4

How Heritage Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Heritage Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.96.9This tracttract 002500Lindsay: 8.28.2Lindsayparent cityCounty: 6.86.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 74

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Heritage Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Heritage Park

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lindsay, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Tulare County average of 6.0 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 74th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 20.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06107002500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06107002500?

Census tract 06107002500 in the Heritage Park neighborhood scores 6.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06107002500?

Median gross rent is $1,278/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06107002500?

19.9% of residents in tract 06107002500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,736.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06107002500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 74th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 71th, minority 83th, housing 47th.
Q5

Is tract 06107002500 considered part of Heritage Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06107002500 fall within Heritage Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06107002500 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06107002500 compare to Lindsay overall?

Tract 06107002500 scores 6.9/10, lower than the parent city of Lindsay at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lindsay; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lindsay

Top eight tracts in Lindsay ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related