Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,578 of 84,120 nationally

Leisure Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Camarillo

Tract 06111005304 · Ventura, CA · pop 5,806 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 06111005304 covers the Leisure Village neighborhood of Camarillo, home to 5,806 residents. For landlords it grades $1/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than roughly 76% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

53% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 33% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,635 a month while the average household earns $74,900 a year, roughly 42% of income at the averages. About 35% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18% Stable renters 16% Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units3,002
Renter share34.7%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate11.1%
Median income$74,900

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Leisure Village
Very High
Within parent city
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 16 tracts In Camarillo
High
Within county
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#81 of 189 tracts In Ventura
Elevated
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#6,078 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Camarillo and the region

Centroid at 34.2200, -118.9909 · click any tract to drill in

Why Leisure Village scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Camarillo
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.1% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$2,635 rent vs county FMR
5.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camarillo
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camarillo
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camarillo
6.5

How Leisure Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Leisure Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.74.7This tracttract 005304Camarillo: 7.97.9Camarilloparent cityCounty: 4.54.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 42

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Leisure Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Leisure Village

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Camarillo, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Ventura County average of 5.8 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 42nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06111005304

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06111005304?

Census tract 06111005304 in the Leisure Village neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06111005304?

Median gross rent is $2,635/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06111005304?

11.1% of residents in tract 06111005304 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,806.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06111005304?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 57th, minority 58th, housing 28th.
Q5

Is tract 06111005304 considered part of Leisure Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06111005304 fall within Leisure Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06111005304 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06111005304 compare to Camarillo overall?

Tract 06111005304 scores 4.7/10, lower than the parent city of Camarillo at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camarillo; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Camarillo

Top eight tracts in Camarillo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related