Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Ashbourne Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Claymont
Tract 10003010200 · New Castle County, DE · pop 2,113 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Tract 10003010200 sits in the Ashbourne Hills area of New Castle County, DE, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. Population here is 2,113. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%
Stable renters 2%
Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units745
Renter share4.3%
SVI overall0.34
Poverty rate3.2%
Median income$112,847
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
11
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
30
th percentile
Low
National
20
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Claymont and the region
Centroid at 39.8088, -75.4682 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ashbourne Hills scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Claymont
3.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.9
State political climate
Delaware legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
3.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Claymont
3.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Claymont
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Claymont
5.0
How Ashbourne Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 34
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 23%Socioeconomic
- 82%Household composition
- 64%Racial/ethnic minority
- 17%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 56Total filings over 9 yrs
- 13.11%Avg annual filing rate
- 23.3%Peak (2012)
- 6Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 50% over the past 9 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 11Total filings 2020-21
- 0.1Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.33×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tampa, FL as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Ashbourne Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.4%Housing insecurity
- 5.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.2%Food insecurity
- 7.8%SNAP enrollment
- 6.0%Transit barriers
- 6.6%No health insurance
- 14.4%Frequent mental distress
- 26.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Ashbourne Hills
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. Cost burden runs 56% here against 44.1% across New Castle County. Against the New Castle County average of 4.2, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.2 points.
Court records carry 56 eviction filings across 9 observed years. Food insecurity runs 10.2% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 7.8% against 15.2% nationally.
On the high side, regional political climate reads 6.9/10. The worst year on record was 2012, when 23.3% of renter households were served.
In a typical year about 13.1% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
At 4% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 10003010200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 10003010200?
Census tract 10003010200 in the Ashbourne Hills neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 10003010200?
3.2% of residents in tract 10003010200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,113.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 10003010200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 34th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 82th, minority 64th, housing 17th.
Q4
Is tract 10003010200 considered part of Ashbourne Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 10003010200 fall within Ashbourne Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 10003010200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 56 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 10003010200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 13.11% of renter households, peaking at 23.3% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 10003010200 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.33× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tampa, FL), 2020-2021.
Q7
What share of households in tract 10003010200 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 10003010200 compare to Claymont overall?
Tract 10003010200 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Claymont at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claymont eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related