Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally
Ashbourne Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Claymont
Tract 10003010200 · New Castle County, DE · pop 2,113 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Tract 10003010200 covers Ashbourne Hills in Claymont in Delaware. Home to 2,113 residents, it scores 5.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 66% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 56% of renter households, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $112,847 a year. About 4% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%
Stable renters 2%
Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units745
Renter share4.3%
SVI overall0.34
Poverty rate3.2%
Median income$112,847
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
25
th percentile
Low
Within state
21
th percentile
Low
National
15
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Claymont and the region
Centroid at 39.8088, -75.4682 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ashbourne Hills scores 2.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Claymont
3.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.9
State political climate
Delaware legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
3.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Claymont
3.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Claymont
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Claymont
5.0
How Ashbourne Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 34
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 23%Socioeconomic
- 82%Household composition
- 64%Racial/ethnic minority
- 17%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 56Total filings over 9 yrs
- 13.11%Avg annual filing rate
- 23.3%Peak (2012)
- 6Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 50% over the past 9 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 11Total filings 2020-21
- 0.1Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.33×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tampa, FL as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Ashbourne Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.4%Housing insecurity
- 5.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.2%Food insecurity
- 7.8%SNAP enrollment
- 6.0%Transit barriers
- 6.6%No health insurance
- 14.4%Frequent mental distress
- 26.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Ashbourne Hills
What moves this score most is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Claymont eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the New Castle County average of 5.7 and in line with the Delaware statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 56 eviction filings here over 9 tracked years, with about 13.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 23.3% of renter households in 2012.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.33x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 10003010200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 10003010200?
Census tract 10003010200 in the Ashbourne Hills neighborhood scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 10003010200?
3.2% of residents in tract 10003010200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,113.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 10003010200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 34th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 82th, minority 64th, housing 17th.
Q4
Is tract 10003010200 considered part of Ashbourne Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 10003010200 fall within Ashbourne Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 10003010200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 56 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 10003010200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 13.11% of renter households, peaking at 23.3% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 10003010200 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.33× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tampa, FL), 2020-2021.
Q7
What share of households in tract 10003010200 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 10003010200 compare to Claymont overall?
Tract 10003010200 scores 2.2/10, lower than the parent city of Claymont at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claymont eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related