Neighborhood · Ranked #54,934 of 84,120 nationally
Margate Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 12011020103 ·
Broward, FL · pop 5,478 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
How risky is the Margate area of Margate for landlords? Census tract 12011020103 scores 5.8/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 69% of US census tracts.
63% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 41% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,596 a month while the average household earns $61,031 a year, roughly 31% of income at the averages. About 45% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29%Stable renters 17%Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units2,255
Renter share45.4%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate11.5%
Median income$61,031
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
56th percentile
#5 of 10 tracts In Margate
Elevated
Within parent city
42th percentile
#8 of 13 tracts In Margate
Moderate
Within county
46th percentile
#227 of 416 tracts In Broward
Moderate
Within state
47th percentile
#2,737 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Margate and the region
Centroid at 26.2387, -80.1986 · click any tract to drill in
Why Margate scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Margate
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
11.5% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$1,596 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Margate
9.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Margate
5.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Margate
7.5
How Margate compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 82
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
69%Socioeconomic
80%Household composition
70%Racial/ethnic minority
85%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
280Total filings over 4 yrs
8.07%Avg annual filing rate
10.1%Peak (2003)
73Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2001 to 2016
Filings climbed 16% over the past 4 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
341Total filings 2020-21
6.0Avg monthly (observed)
6.9Pre-pandemic baseline
0.87×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2024-09-01
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Lauderdale as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 9.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Margate, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Broward County average of 5.4 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 280 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 8.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 10.1% of renter households in 2003.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 82nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 12011020103
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12011020103?
Census tract 12011020103 in the Margate neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12011020103?
Median gross rent is $1,596/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12011020103?
11.5% of residents in tract 12011020103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,478.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12011020103?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 80th, minority 70th, housing 85th.
Q5
Is tract 12011020103 considered part of Margate?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12011020103 fall within Margate (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12011020103?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 280 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 12011020103 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.07% of renter households, peaking at 10.1% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 12011020103 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.87× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Lauderdale eviction risk), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 12011020103 compare to Margate overall?
Tract 12011020103 scores 3.2/10, higher than the parent city of Margate at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Margate; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Margate
Top eight tracts in Margate ranked by composite eviction-risk score.