Neighborhood · Ranked #39,389 of 84,120 nationally
Hollywood Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 12011090802 ·
Broward, FL · pop 4,408 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
With a score of 4.9/10, tract 12011090802 in the Hollywood neighborhood of Hollywood ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 4,408 residents. That is riskier than roughly 36% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 86% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 69% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,465 monthly, set against $55,438 in average yearly household income, roughly 32% of income at the averages. About 32% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28%Stable renters 5%Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units2,115
Renter share32.3%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate11.8%
Median income$55,438
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
86th percentile
#2 of 8 tracts In Hollywood
High
Within parent city
60th percentile
#15 of 36 tracts In Hollywood
Elevated
Within county
73th percentile
#113 of 416 tracts In Broward
Elevated
Within state
70th percentile
#1,537 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Hollywood and the region
Centroid at 26.0300, -80.1785 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hollywood scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hollywood
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
11.8% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$1,465 rent vs county FMR
1.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hollywood
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hollywood
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hollywood
4.0
How Hollywood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 77
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
57%Socioeconomic
89%Household composition
66%Racial/ethnic minority
76%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
148Total filings over 4 yrs
7.86%Avg annual filing rate
13.1%Peak (2002)
10Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2001 to 2016
Filings dropped 66% over the past 4 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
134Total filings 2020-21
2.4Avg monthly (observed)
1.5Pre-pandemic baseline
1.55×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2024-09-01
Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Lauderdale as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
The heaviest input here is housing court bias at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hollywood eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Broward County average of 5.4 and in line with the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.55x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 148 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 7.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 13.1% of renter households in 2002.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 12011090802
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12011090802?
Census tract 12011090802 in the Hollywood neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12011090802?
Median gross rent is $1,465/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 86% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12011090802?
11.8% of residents in tract 12011090802 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,408.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12011090802?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 57th, household 89th, minority 66th, housing 76th.
Q5
Is tract 12011090802 considered part of Hollywood?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12011090802 fall within Hollywood (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12011090802?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 148 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 12011090802 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.86% of renter households, peaking at 13.1% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 12011090802 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.55× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Lauderdale eviction risk), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 12011090802 compare to Hollywood overall?
Tract 12011090802 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of Hollywood at 2.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hollywood eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Hollywood
Top eight tracts in Hollywood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.