Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,316 of 84,120 nationally

Altos Verdes Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tampa

Tract 12057000701 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 3,669 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Here is how census tract 12057000701, in the Altos Verdes area of Tampa eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 5.6/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 3,669. On the national scale it ranks #32,066 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 66% of renter households, a severe level, and 44% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,331 monthly, set against $41,458 in average yearly household income, roughly 39% of income at the averages. About 74% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 49% Stable renters 25% Owners 26%
Tract context
Occupied units1,157
Renter share74.1%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate45.4%
Median income$41,458

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#4 of 9 tracts In Altos Verdes
Elevated
Within parent city
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 104 tracts In Tampa
High
Within county
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Very High
Within state
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#175 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tampa and the region

Centroid at 28.0277, -82.4457 · click any tract to drill in

Why Altos Verdes scores 5.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tampa
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
45.4% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$1,331 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tampa
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tampa
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tampa
3.5

How Altos Verdes compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Altos Verdes risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.85.8This tracttract 000701Tampa: 2.72.7Tampaparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 99

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 362Total filings 2020-21
  • 5.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 9.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.54×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 11 filings (1.02× baseline)2020-02-01: 7 filings (0.76× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (0.52× baseline)2020-04-01: 5 filings (0.41× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2020-06-01: 6 filings (0.63× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.19× baseline)2020-08-01: 7 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-10-01: 8 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 6 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-12-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.47× baseline)2021-02-01: 5 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-03-01: 7 filings (0.90× baseline)2021-04-01: 5 filings (0.41× baseline)2021-05-01: 5 filings (0.49× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2021-08-01: 8 filings (0.91× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (0.41× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (0.74× baseline)2021-12-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-01-01: 7 filings (0.65× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (0.54× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (0.16× baseline)2022-05-01: 6 filings (0.59× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (0.32× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (0.37× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.23× baseline)2022-09-01: 4 filings (0.41× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-12-01: 7 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 6 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2023-03-01: 10 filings (1.29× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.08× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (0.59× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (0.53× baseline)2023-07-01: 7 filings (0.65× baseline)2023-08-01: 9 filings (1.03× baseline)2023-09-01: 10 filings (1.03× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.25× baseline)2023-11-01: 7 filings (1.04× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (0.29× baseline)2024-01-01: 4 filings (0.37× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-03-01: 8 filings (1.03× baseline)2024-04-01: 6 filings (0.49× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (0.59× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2024-07-01: 6 filings (0.56× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (0.51× baseline)2024-10-01: 6 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (0.59× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-01-01: 5 filings (0.47× baseline)2025-02-01: 7 filings (0.76× baseline)2025-03-01: 5 filings (0.65× baseline)2025-04-01: 5 filings (0.41× baseline)2025-05-01: 8 filings (0.78× baseline)2025-06-01: 7 filings (0.74× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2025-08-01: 7 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (0.62× baseline)2025-10-01: 5 filings (0.63× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (0.59× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Altos Verdes. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Altos Verdes

What moves this score most is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tampa eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.54x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 99th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057000701

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057000701?

Census tract 12057000701 in the Altos Verdes neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057000701?

Median gross rent is $1,331/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 66% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057000701?

45.4% of residents in tract 12057000701 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,669.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057000701?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 100th, household 95th, minority 91th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 12057000701 considered part of Altos Verdes?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057000701 fall within Altos Verdes (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 12057000701 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.54× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 12057000701 compare to Tampa overall?

Tract 12057000701 scores 5.8/10, higher than the parent city of Tampa at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tampa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 12057000701 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tampa

Top eight tracts in Tampa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related