Princess Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tampa
Tract 12057002701 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 4,154 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Tract 12057002701 sits in the Princess Park area of Tampa eviction risk, FL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.1/10. It is home to 4,154 residents. Against Hillsborough County at 51.5%, 70% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Tampa and the region
Centroid at 27.9766, -82.4899 · click any tract to drill in
Why Princess Park scores 5.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Princess Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 69
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 77%Socioeconomic
- 60%Household composition
- 85%Racial/ethnic minority
- 38%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 20%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 156Total filings 2020-21
- 2.1Avg monthly (observed)
- 2.8Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.77×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
What drives eviction risk in Princess Park
The severe-burden share is 36%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Pulling hardest the other way is state political climate at 1.5/10. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10.
Adults with no health insurance runs 24.1% against 11.3% nationally. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.2/10.
The poverty rate is 19%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. At $1,416 a month, rents run 17% under what the rest of Tampa commands. It sits 0.9 points above the Hillsborough County average of 4.2.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 63rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Statewide the FL average is 4.1, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 12057002701
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057002701?
What is the average rent in tract 12057002701?
What is the poverty rate in tract 12057002701?
How socially vulnerable is tract 12057002701?
Is tract 12057002701 considered part of Princess Park?
Did eviction filings in tract 12057002701 drop during COVID?
How does tract 12057002701 compare to Tampa overall?
Was tract 12057002701 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Tampa
Top eight tracts in Tampa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.