Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #20,889 of 84,120 nationally

Riverside Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tampa

Tract 12057005000 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 7,817 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

In the Riverside area of Tampa, census tract 12057005000 scores 5.2/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than about 47% of US census tracts.

58% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 36% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,754 monthly, set against $49,238 in average yearly household income, roughly 43% of income at the averages. Renters make up 93% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 54% Stable renters 40% Owners 6%
Tract context
Occupied units1,727
Renter share93.2%
SVI overall0.72
Poverty rate23.7%
Median income$49,238

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Riverside
Very High
Within parent city
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#25 of 104 tracts In Tampa
High
Within county
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#35 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
High
Within state
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#462 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tampa and the region

Centroid at 27.9479, -82.4707 · click any tract to drill in

Why Riverside scores 5.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tampa
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
23.7% poverty · this tract
5.9
Supply constraint
$1,754 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tampa
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tampa
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tampa
3.5

How Riverside compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Riverside risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.35.3This tracttract 005000Tampa: 2.72.7Tampaparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 72

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 413Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 4.85%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.9%Peak (2000)
  • 36Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 120570050002000: 56 filings (7.94/100 renter HHs)2001: 41 filings (5.82/100 renter HHs)2002: 18 filings (2.55/100 renter HHs)2003: 41 filings (5.82/100 renter HHs)2004: 16 filings (2.27/100 renter HHs)2005: 33 filings (5.65/100 renter HHs)2009: 45 filings (7.71/100 renter HHs)2010: 46 filings (4.75/100 renter HHs)2011: 53 filings (5.35/100 renter HHs)2015: 28 filings (2.83/100 renter HHs)2016: 36 filings (2.63/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 36% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 198Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.85×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2022-02-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 6 filings (1.26× baseline)2022-08-01: 7 filings (1.87× baseline)2022-09-01: 11 filings (5.50× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-11-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2023-04-01: 6 filings (2.18× baseline)2023-05-01: 5 filings (1.54× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2023-08-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 6 filings (2.40× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2024-08-01: 7 filings (1.87× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-07-01: 7 filings (1.47× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Riverside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Riverside

What moves this score most is economic stress at 5.9/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tampa eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and in line with the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 49% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 72nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057005000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057005000?

Census tract 12057005000 in the Riverside neighborhood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057005000?

Median gross rent is $1,754/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057005000?

23.7% of residents in tract 12057005000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,817.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057005000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 72th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 84th, household 4th, minority 56th, housing 95th.
Q5

Is tract 12057005000 considered part of Riverside?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057005000 fall within Riverside (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057005000?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 413 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057005000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.85% of renter households, peaking at 7.9% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12057005000 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.85× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12057005000 compare to Tampa overall?

Tract 12057005000 scores 5.3/10, higher than the parent city of Tampa at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tampa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 12057005000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 49% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tampa

Top eight tracts in Tampa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related