Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Aberdeen on Glen Eviction Risk: Lower , Tampa
Tract 12057006200 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 4,409 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi
Census tract 12057006200 covers part of the Aberdeen on Glen area of Tampa, FL, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,409. Against Hillsborough County at 51.5%, 23% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units1,602
Renter share28.5%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate3.4%
Median income$156,111
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
18
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
14
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
28
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Tampa and the region
Centroid at 27.9169, -82.5003 · click any tract to drill in
Why Aberdeen on Glen scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Tampa
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,751 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tampa
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tampa
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tampa
3.5
How Aberdeen on Glen compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 4
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 7%Socioeconomic
- 14%Household composition
- 28%Racial/ethnic minority
- 7%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 61%Grade B
- 2%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 84Total filings over 11 yrs
- 2.07%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.5%Peak (2000)
- 5Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 62% over the past 11 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 15Total filings 2020-21
- 0.2Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.67×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Aberdeen on Glen. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Aberdeen on Glen
The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10.
On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10. Disability prevalence runs 17.2% against 31.5% nationally.
It sits 1.2 points below the Hillsborough County average of 4.2. The severe-burden share is 10%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 84 filings here across 11 tracked years.
The worst year on record was 2000, when 3.5% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Tampa. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 2.1% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 12057006200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057006200?
Census tract 12057006200 in the Aberdeen on Glen neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12057006200?
Median gross rent is $1,751/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12057006200?
3.4% of residents in tract 12057006200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,409.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12057006200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 14th, minority 28th, housing 7th.
Q5
Is tract 12057006200 considered part of Aberdeen on Glen?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057006200 fall within Aberdeen on Glen (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057006200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 84 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057006200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.07% of renter households, peaking at 3.5% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 12057006200 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.67× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 12057006200 compare to Tampa overall?
Tract 12057006200 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Tampa at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tampa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 12057006200 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Tampa
Top eight tracts in Tampa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · FL
Habana Court North
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · FL
Vieux Carre
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · FL
12057000101
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · FL
Altos Verdes
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · FL
Drew Park
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · FL
Dills
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · FL
Altos Verdes
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · FL
Mora
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Related