Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #72,539 of 84,120 nationally
Aberdeen on Glen Eviction Risk: Lower , Tampa
Tract 12057006200 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 4,409 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi
In the Aberdeen on Glen area of Tampa, census tract 12057006200 scores 3.8/10 for eviction risk. It lands near the 9th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 23% of renter households, a moderate level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,751 monthly, set against $156,111 in average yearly household income, roughly 13% of income at the averages. About 28% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units1,602
Renter share28.5%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate3.4%
Median income$156,111
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
3
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
15
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
15
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Tampa and the region
Centroid at 27.9169, -82.5003 · click any tract to drill in
Why Aberdeen on Glen scores 2.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Tampa
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,751 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tampa
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tampa
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tampa
3.5
How Aberdeen on Glen compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 4
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 7%Socioeconomic
- 14%Household composition
- 28%Racial/ethnic minority
- 7%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 61%Grade B
- 2%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 84Total filings over 11 yrs
- 2.07%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.5%Peak (2000)
- 5Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 62% over the past 11 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 15Total filings 2020-21
- 0.2Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.67×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Aberdeen on Glen. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Aberdeen on Glen
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tampa eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and below the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 4th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.67x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 12057006200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057006200?
Census tract 12057006200 in the Aberdeen on Glen neighborhood scores 2.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12057006200?
Median gross rent is $1,751/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12057006200?
3.4% of residents in tract 12057006200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,409.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12057006200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 14th, minority 28th, housing 7th.
Q5
Is tract 12057006200 considered part of Aberdeen on Glen?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057006200 fall within Aberdeen on Glen (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057006200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 84 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057006200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.07% of renter households, peaking at 3.5% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 12057006200 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.67× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 12057006200 compare to Tampa overall?
Tract 12057006200 scores 2.1/10, lower than the parent city of Tampa at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tampa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 12057006200 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Tampa
Top eight tracts in Tampa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · FL
The Oaks
6.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · FL
Altos Verdes
6.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · FL
Alameda
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · FL
Altamira Heights
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · FL
Altos Verdes
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · FL
Alameda
5.9
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · FL
Vedado
5.9
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · FL
Del Rio
5.9
/ 10 · Elevated
Related