Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,998 of 84,120 nationally

Highland Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Westchase

Tract 12057011506 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 9,288 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 12057011506 covers Highland Park in Westchase, home to 9,288 residents. For landlords it grades 4.7/10, a moderate reading. It lands near the 30th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

33% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,011 monthly, set against $131,961 in average yearly household income, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 43% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 29% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units3,441
Renter share43.3%
SVI overall0.34
Poverty rate7.2%
Median income$131,961

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Highland Park
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 5 tracts In Westchase
Moderate
Within county
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#320 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Very Low
Within state
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#4,951 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Westchase and the region

Centroid at 28.0708, -82.6114 · click any tract to drill in

Why Highland Park scores 1.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Westchase
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
7.2% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$2,011 rent vs county FMR
5.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Westchase
5.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Westchase
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Westchase
4.5

How Highland Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Highland Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.41.4This tracttract 011506Westchase: 2.12.1Westchaseparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 34

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 270Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 5.01%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.4%Peak (2010)
  • 28Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 120570115062000: 4 filings (1.87/100 renter HHs)2001: 3 filings (1.40/100 renter HHs)2002: 11 filings (5.14/100 renter HHs)2003: 28 filings (13.07/100 renter HHs)2004: 34 filings (15.87/100 renter HHs)2005: 32 filings (3.20/100 renter HHs)2009: 30 filings (3.00/100 renter HHs)2010: 41 filings (4.40/100 renter HHs)2011: 35 filings (2.83/100 renter HHs)2015: 24 filings (1.94/100 renter HHs)2016: 28 filings (2.41/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 600% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 299Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.35×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2020-10-01: 7 filings (1.65× baseline)2020-11-01: 5 filings (1.18× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-01-01: 6 filings (1.85× baseline)2021-02-01: 5 filings (1.54× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-10-01: 7 filings (1.65× baseline)2021-11-01: 6 filings (1.41× baseline)2021-12-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 7 filings (2.15× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2022-07-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2022-08-01: 14 filings (5.60× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (2.40× baseline)2022-10-01: 8 filings (1.88× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2022-12-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (1.54× baseline)2023-03-01: 6 filings (3.43× baseline)2023-04-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (2.40× baseline)2023-06-01: 7 filings (2.55× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-08-01: 11 filings (4.40× baseline)2023-09-01: 7 filings (2.80× baseline)2023-10-01: 10 filings (2.35× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 14 filings (4.67× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (2.15× baseline)2024-02-01: 10 filings (3.08× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2024-04-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (2.40× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2024-07-01: 8 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (2.40× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2024-11-01: 9 filings (2.12× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Highland Park

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Westchase, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and in line with the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 34th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 270 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 5.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.4% of renter households in 2010.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057011506

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057011506?

Census tract 12057011506 in the Highland Park neighborhood scores 1.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057011506?

Median gross rent is $2,011/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057011506?

7.2% of residents in tract 12057011506 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 9,288.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057011506?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 34th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 23th, minority 63th, housing 47th.
Q5

Is tract 12057011506 considered part of Highland Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057011506 fall within Highland Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057011506?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 270 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057011506 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.01% of renter households, peaking at 4.4% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12057011506 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.35× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12057011506 compare to Westchase overall?

Tract 12057011506 scores 1.4/10, lower than the parent city of Westchase at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Westchase; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Westchase

Top eight tracts in Westchase ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related