Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,239 of 84,120 nationally

Mango Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 12057012108 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 3,850 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 12057012108 covers part of the Mango Hills area of Seffner, FL, and scores 4.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,850 residents. 67% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Hillsborough County average of 51.5%.

Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 5% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,222
Renter share16.0%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate18.4%
Median income$69,186

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Mango Hills
Very Low
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Mango
Very High
Within county
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#158 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Moderate
Within state
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#1,882 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mango and the region

Centroid at 27.9942, -82.2819 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mango Hills scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mango
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
18.4% poverty · this tract
4.6
Supply constraint
$1,446 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mango
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mango
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mango
4.6

How Mango Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mango Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.3This tracttract 0121084.4Mangoparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 62

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 166Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 5.74%Avg annual filing rate
  • 11.5%Peak (2016)
  • 36Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 12057012108
Filings climbed 300% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 124Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.78×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mango Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mango Hills

Pulling hardest the other way is eviction-process difficulty at 1.4/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

Average gross rent is $1,446, 20% below the Seffner average. Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.3/10. The poverty rate is 18%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

Court records carry 166 eviction filings across 11 observed years. Filings peaked in 2016 at 11.5% of renter households.

In a typical year about 5.7% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 47% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 16% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Social vulnerability reads 6.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057012108

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057012108?

Census tract 12057012108 in the Mango Hills neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057012108?

Median gross rent is $1,446/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057012108?

18.4% of residents in tract 12057012108 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,850.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057012108?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 59th, minority 73th, housing 66th.
Q5

Is tract 12057012108 considered part of Mango Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057012108 fall within Mango Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057012108?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 166 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057012108 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.74% of renter households, peaking at 11.5% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12057012108 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.78× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12057012108 compare to Mango overall?

Tract 12057012108 scores 4.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Mango at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mango; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mango

Top eight tracts in Mango ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related