Neighborhood · Ranked #49,882 of 84,120 nationally
Mango Hills Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 12057012108 ·
Hillsborough, FL · pop 3,850 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Tract 12057012108, home to 3,850 residents in the Mango Hills neighborhood of Mango, scores 5.1/10 for landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #47,769 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 67% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,446 a month against an average household income of $69,186 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 16% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%Stable renters 5%Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,222
Renter share16.0%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate18.4%
Median income$69,186
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#3 of 3 tracts In Mango Hills
Very Low
Within parent city
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In Mango
Very High
Within county
49th percentile
#169 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Moderate
Within state
54th percentile
#2,345 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Mango and the region
Centroid at 27.9942, -82.2819 · click any tract to drill in
Why Mango Hills scores 3.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mango
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
18.4% poverty · this tract
4.6
Supply constraint
$1,446 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mango
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mango
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mango
4.6
How Mango Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 62
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
48%Socioeconomic
59%Household composition
73%Racial/ethnic minority
66%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
166Total filings over 11 yrs
5.74%Avg annual filing rate
11.5%Peak (2016)
36Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2000 to 2016
Filings climbed 300% over the past 11 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
124Total filings 2020-21
1.7Avg monthly (observed)
2.2Pre-pandemic baseline
0.78×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Mango Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
What moves this score most is economic stress at 4.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Mango, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and in line with the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 166 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 5.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 11.5% of renter households in 2016.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.78x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 12057012108
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057012108?
Census tract 12057012108 in the Mango Hills neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12057012108?
Median gross rent is $1,446/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12057012108?
18.4% of residents in tract 12057012108 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,850.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12057012108?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 59th, minority 73th, housing 66th.
Q5
Is tract 12057012108 considered part of Mango Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057012108 fall within Mango Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057012108?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 166 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057012108 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.74% of renter households, peaking at 11.5% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 12057012108 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.78× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 12057012108 compare to Mango overall?
Tract 12057012108 scores 3.5/10, higher than the parent city of Mango at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mango; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Mango
Top eight tracts in Mango ranked by composite eviction-risk score.