Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #26,446 of 84,120 nationally

Mango Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 12057012107 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 4,589 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

For landlords sizing up the Mango Hills area of Mango, census tract 12057012107 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 5.9/10. It lands near the 72nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 59% of renter households, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,199 monthly, set against $44,430 in average yearly household income, roughly 32% of income at the averages. Renters make up 41% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 17% Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units1,996
Renter share41.3%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate18.6%
Median income$44,430

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Mango Hills
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Mango
Moderate
Within county
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#55 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#755 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mango and the region

Centroid at 27.9914, -82.2920 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mango Hills scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mango
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
18.6% poverty · this tract
4.6
Supply constraint
$1,199 rent vs county FMR
1.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mango
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mango
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mango
8.2

How Mango Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mango Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.94.9This tracttract 012107Mango: 2.52.5Mangoparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 76

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 658Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 9.15%Avg annual filing rate
  • 14.8%Peak (2001)
  • 48Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 120570121072000: 89 filings (14.45/100 renter HHs)2001: 91 filings (14.77/100 renter HHs)2002: 85 filings (13.80/100 renter HHs)2003: 75 filings (12.18/100 renter HHs)2004: 47 filings (7.63/100 renter HHs)2005: 55 filings (8.05/100 renter HHs)2009: 39 filings (5.70/100 renter HHs)2010: 42 filings (5.43/100 renter HHs)2011: 42 filings (5.88/100 renter HHs)2015: 45 filings (6.30/100 renter HHs)2016: 48 filings (6.50/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 46% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 240Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.83×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2020-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2020-09-01: 5 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.91× baseline)2021-02-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-05-01: 6 filings (1.60× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-09-01: 5 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2023-02-01: 7 filings (3.50× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2023-04-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2023-05-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-10-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-02-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (0.76× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-06-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-08-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2025-09-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-10-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mango Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mango Hills

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Mango, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 76th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 658 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 9.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 14.8% of renter households in 2001.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057012107

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057012107?

Census tract 12057012107 in the Mango Hills neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057012107?

Median gross rent is $1,199/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057012107?

18.6% of residents in tract 12057012107 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,589.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057012107?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 73th, minority 66th, housing 42th.
Q5

Is tract 12057012107 considered part of Mango Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057012107 fall within Mango Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057012107?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 658 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057012107 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.15% of renter households, peaking at 14.8% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12057012107 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.83× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12057012107 compare to Mango overall?

Tract 12057012107 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Mango at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mango; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mango

Top eight tracts in Mango ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related