Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally
Rolling Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , On Top of the World
Tract 12083002604 · Marion, FL · pop 3,829 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
In Rolling Hills in On Top of the World, census tract 12083002604 scores 5.4/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than about 54% of US census tracts.
89% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 69% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,908 a month against an average household income of $68,382 a year, roughly 33% of income at the averages. Renters make up 6% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 1%
Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units1,632
Renter share6.3%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate16.0%
Median income$68,382
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
67
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
26
th percentile
Low
Within state
52
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across On Top of the World and the region
Centroid at 29.1018, -82.3271 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rolling Hills scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from On Top of the World
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.7
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
16.0% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,908 rent vs county FMR
9.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from On Top of the World
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from On Top of the World
2.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from On Top of the World
5.6
How Rolling Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 47
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 71%Socioeconomic
- 59%Household composition
- 38%Racial/ethnic minority
- 14%Housing & transportation
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills
What moves this score most is supply constraint at 9.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from On Top of the World, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Marion County average of 4.8 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 47th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 12083002604
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12083002604?
Census tract 12083002604 in the Rolling Hills neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12083002604?
Median gross rent is $1,908/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 89% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12083002604?
16.0% of residents in tract 12083002604 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,829.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12083002604?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 71th, household 59th, minority 38th, housing 14th.
Q5
Is tract 12083002604 considered part of Rolling Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12083002604 fall within Rolling Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How does tract 12083002604 compare to On Top of the World overall?
Tract 12083002604 scores 3.4/10, higher than the parent city of On Top of the World at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from On Top of the World; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in On Top of the World
Top eight tracts in On Top of the World ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related