1 census tracts · pop 3,829 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3.2/10
· range 3.2–3.2
Rolling Hills maps to a single census tract in On Top of the World, FL, population 3,829. That produces an Eviction Risk Score of 3.2/10, Lower tier. 69% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate.
89% of renters here are cost-burdened at the 30% threshold, dramatically above the On Top of the World rate of 29.8%. Average gross rent is $1,908, 57% above the On Top of the World average of $1,212. The voucher gap is 44.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which shows up as churn rather than arrears.
What pushes the score up most is supply constraint at 9.4/10. Set annual rent against average household income of $68,382 and the ratio lands at 33%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. On the softer side is eviction-process difficulty, at 1.7/10.
Running hot is rent-regulation exposure at 7.7/10. The poverty rate is 16%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than the filing statistics suggest.
At 6% renter-occupied, this is predominantly owner territory, and rental comps have to be drawn from further out.
One tract means one number: 3.2/10 applies directly to any address inside the boundary. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
1 tracts · population-weighted
Rolling Hills vs On Top of the WorldHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority38%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport14%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Frequently asked
About Rolling Hills
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for Rolling Hills?
Rolling Hills scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does Rolling Hills compare to On Top of the World overall?
Rolling Hills scores 0.0 points higher than On Top of the World overall (3.2/10). Renters spend 89% of income on rent vs 30% citywide. Average rent: $1,908 vs $1,212.
Q3
What is the average rent in Rolling Hills?
Average gross rent in Rolling Hills is $1,908/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 89% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of Rolling Hills residents are renters?
6% of Rolling Hills households are renter-occupied (vs 7% in On Top of the World). The neighborhood has 3,829 residents.
Q5
Is Rolling Hills a high social-vulnerability area?
Rolling Hills sits in the 47th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (less vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
How safe is Rolling Hills for landlords?
Rolling Hills carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3.2/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to On Top of the World as a whole (3.2/10), this neighborhood is in line with the citywide level.
Q7
What is the demographic breakdown of Rolling Hills?
Rolling Hills has 4,048 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (77.9%), Hispanic / Latino (15.9%), Black (non-Hispanic) (3.2%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
