Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally

Chuluota Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 12117021205 · Seminole, FL · pop 4,483 · 39% of tract blocks fall in Chuluota

Tract 12117021205 sits in Chuluota, FL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.4/10. It is home to 4,483 residents. 53% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 3% Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,507
Renter share8.4%
SVI overall0.12
Poverty rate11.9%
Median income$121,435

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Chuluota
Moderate
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#60 of 89 tracts In Seminole
Low
Within state
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#3,121 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Low
National
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#59,654 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chuluota and the region

Centroid at 28.6477, -81.0447 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chuluota scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chuluota
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
11.9% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chuluota
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chuluota
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chuluota
8.6

How Chuluota compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chuluota risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.4This tracttract 0212054.0Chuluotaparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 12

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chuluota

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 9.6/10. Against Seminole County at 52.5%, 68% of renters here are cost-burdened. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.1/10.

On the high side, housing-court posture reads 8.6/10. It sits 0.8 points below the Seminole County average of 4.2.

On the national scale it lands near the 29th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 8% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 12117021205

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12117021205?

Census tract 12117021205 in Chuluota scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 12117021205?

11.9% of residents in tract 12117021205 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,483.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 12117021205?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 12th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 40th, household 26th, minority 49th, housing 1th.
Q4

How does tract 12117021205 compare to Chuluota overall?

Tract 12117021205 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Chuluota at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chuluota; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related