Census Tract · Ranked #68,306 of 84,120 nationally
White Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 13015960104 ·
Bartow County, GA · pop 2,677 · 29% of tract blocks fall in White
Census tract 13015960104 covers White, home to 2,677 residents. For landlords it grades $1/10, a moderate reading. That is riskier than roughly 39% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
46% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 2% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,179 a month against an average household income of $71,250 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 22% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%Stable renters 12%Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,009
Renter share21.6%
SVI overall0.60
Poverty rate4.2%
Median income$71,250
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In White
Moderate
Within county
19th percentile
#23 of 28 tracts In Bartow County
Very Low
Within state
23th percentile
#2,156 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
National
19th percentile
#68,306 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across White and the region
Centroid at 34.2882, -84.7104 · click any tract to drill in
Why White scores 2.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from White
3.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
4.2% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,179 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from White
3.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from White
8.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from White
2.9
How White compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 60
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
11.0%Housing insecurity
6.5%Utility-shutoff threat
13.1%Food insecurity
9.6%SNAP enrollment
7.4%Transit barriers
12.6%No health insurance
18.4%Frequent mental distress
30.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in White
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from White, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Bartow County average of 5.1 and below the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 11.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 60th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 13015960104
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13015960104?
Census tract 13015960104 in White scores 2.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13015960104?
Median gross rent is $1,179/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13015960104?
4.2% of residents in tract 13015960104 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,677.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13015960104?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 60th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 71th, household 73th, minority 15th, housing 42th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 13015960104 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 13015960104 compare to White overall?
Tract 13015960104 scores 2.4/10, right in line with the parent city of White at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from White; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.