Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Kings Forest Eviction Risk: Lower , Riverdale

Tract 13063040509 · Clayton County, GA · pop 4,548 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

13063040509 is a census tract in the Kings Forest area of Riverdale, GA. It scores 3/10 for landlords. The severe-burden share is 35%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 11% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units1,721
Renter share23.9%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$63,057

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Kings Forest
Moderate
Within parent city
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 12 tracts In Riverdale
Very Low
Within county
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#64 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Very Low
Within state
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#2,121 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Riverdale and the region

Centroid at 33.5825, -84.4471 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kings Forest scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Riverdale
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,467 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Riverdale
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Riverdale
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Riverdale
6.8

How Kings Forest compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kings Forest risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0405094.0Riverdaleparent city4.4Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 53

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,278Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 37.44%Avg annual filing rate
  • 23.8%Peak (2015)
  • 126Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 13063040509
Filings climbed 73% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 514Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kings Forest

The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.9/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.9/10.

Running hot, local political climate reads 8.7/10. It sits 1.4 points below the Clayton County average of 4.4. The filing record is not thin: 1,278 evictions over 11 years of observation.

The worst year on record was 2015, when 23.8% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 37.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 24% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.8/10. Statewide the GA average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. 53% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040509

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040509?

Census tract 13063040509 in the Kings Forest neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040509?

Median gross rent is $1,467/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040509?

7.1% of residents in tract 13063040509 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,548.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040509?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 78th, minority 95th, housing 9th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040509 considered part of Kings Forest?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040509 fall within Kings Forest (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040509?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,278 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040509 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 37.44% of renter households, peaking at 23.8% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040509 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040509 compare to Riverdale overall?

Tract 13063040509 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Riverdale at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Riverdale

Top eight tracts in Riverdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related