Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally
Kings Forest Eviction Risk: Lower , Riverdale
Tract 13063040509 · Clayton County, GA · pop 4,548 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Census tract 13063040509 belongs to the Kings Forest neighborhood of Riverdale, Georgia. It is home to 4,548 residents and scores 6.6/10, an elevated reading for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 89% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 53% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 35% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,467 monthly, set against $63,057 in average yearly household income, roughly 28% of income at the averages. About 24% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 11%
Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units1,721
Renter share23.9%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$63,057
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
18
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
16
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
49
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Riverdale and the region
Centroid at 33.5825, -84.4471 · click any tract to drill in
Why Kings Forest scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Riverdale
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,467 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Riverdale
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Riverdale
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Riverdale
6.8
How Kings Forest compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 53
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 62%Socioeconomic
- 78%Household composition
- 95%Racial/ethnic minority
- 9%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,278Total filings over 11 yrs
- 37.44%Avg annual filing rate
- 23.8%Peak (2015)
- 126Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 73% over the past 11 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 514Total filings 2020-21
- 6.8Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 19.9%Housing insecurity
- 12.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 21.3%Food insecurity
- 16.7%SNAP enrollment
- 11.0%Transit barriers
- 11.5%No health insurance
- 16.2%Frequent mental distress
- 28.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Kings Forest
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Riverdale, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,278 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 37.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 23.8% of renter households in 2015.
In CDC survey modeling, about 19.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 13063040509
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040509?
Census tract 13063040509 in the Kings Forest neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13063040509?
Median gross rent is $1,467/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040509?
7.1% of residents in tract 13063040509 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,548.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040509?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 78th, minority 95th, housing 9th.
Q5
Is tract 13063040509 considered part of Kings Forest?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040509 fall within Kings Forest (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040509?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,278 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040509 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 37.44% of renter households, peaking at 23.8% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 13063040509 struggle to pay rent?
About 19.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 13063040509 compare to Riverdale overall?
Tract 13063040509 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Riverdale at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Riverdale
Top eight tracts in Riverdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · GA
Oak Village
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · GA
Sherwood Park
5.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · GA
Quail Valley
5.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · GA
Frog Hollow
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · GA
Sherwood Park
4.9
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · GA
Spring Valley
4.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · GA
Saranac
4.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · GA
Shangri-La on the Lake
4
/ 10 · Moderate
Related