Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally
Stonewall Eviction Risk: Lower , Vinings
Tract 13067031207 · Cobb County, GA · pop 5,182 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
With a score of 5.5/10, tract 13067031207 in the Stonewall neighborhood of Vinings ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 5,182 residents. On the national scale it ranks #35,548 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 34% of renter households, a high level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,800 a month while the average household earns $91,127 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 75% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26%
Stable renters 50%
Owners 24%
Tract context
Occupied units3,687
Renter share75.2%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$91,127
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
43
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
13
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Vinings and the region
Centroid at 33.8711, -84.4702 · click any tract to drill in
Why Stonewall scores 1.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Vinings
7.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,800 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Vinings
4.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Vinings
9.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Vinings
4.0
How Stonewall compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 7
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 21%Socioeconomic
- 1%Household composition
- 70%Racial/ethnic minority
- 23%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 322Total filings over 1 yrs
- 16.10%Avg annual filing rate
- 16.1%Peak (2016)
- 322Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 3,016Total filings 2020-21
- 39.7Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Stonewall. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.1%Housing insecurity
- 5.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.2%Food insecurity
- 5.1%SNAP enrollment
- 5.6%Transit barriers
- 7.5%No health insurance
- 14.5%Frequent mental distress
- 17.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Stonewall
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Vinings, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Cobb County average of 5.5 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 322 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 16.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 16.1% of renter households in 2016.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 13067031207
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13067031207?
Census tract 13067031207 in the Stonewall neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13067031207?
Median gross rent is $1,800/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13067031207?
2.6% of residents in tract 13067031207 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,182.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13067031207?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 1th, minority 70th, housing 23th.
Q5
Is tract 13067031207 considered part of Stonewall?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13067031207 fall within Stonewall (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13067031207?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 322 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 13067031207 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 16.10% of renter households, peaking at 16.1% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 13067031207 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 13067031207 compare to Vinings overall?
Tract 13067031207 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Vinings at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Vinings; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Vinings
Top eight tracts in Vinings ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related