Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally
Stonewall Eviction Risk: Lower , Vinings
Tract 13067031218 ·
Cobb County, GA · pop 2,303 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
With a score of 5.7/10, tract 13067031218 in Stonewall in Vinings ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 2,303 residents. That is riskier than about 65% of US census tracts.
42% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,702 a month against an average household income of $95,703 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 65% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27%Stable renters 38%Owners 35%
Tract context
Occupied units1,318
Renter share64.7%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$95,703
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Stonewall
Very Low
Within parent city
25th percentile
#4 of 5 tracts In Vinings
Low
Within county
42th percentile
#109 of 186 tracts In Cobb County
Moderate
Within state
13th percentile
#2,428 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Vinings and the region
Centroid at 33.8626, -84.4746 · click any tract to drill in
Why Stonewall scores 1.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Vinings
7.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,702 rent vs county FMR
4.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Vinings
4.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Vinings
9.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Vinings
4.0
How Stonewall compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 6
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
21%Socioeconomic
1%Household composition
62%Racial/ethnic minority
17%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
1,125Total filings 2020-21
14.8Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
9.6%Housing insecurity
5.8%Utility-shutoff threat
9.0%Food insecurity
5.8%SNAP enrollment
5.9%Transit barriers
8.0%No health insurance
14.4%Frequent mental distress
19.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Stonewall
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Vinings, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Cobb County average of 5.5 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 6th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 13067031218
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13067031218?
Census tract 13067031218 in the Stonewall neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13067031218?
Median gross rent is $1,702/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13067031218?
3.8% of residents in tract 13067031218 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,303.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13067031218?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 1th, minority 62th, housing 17th.
Q5
Is tract 13067031218 considered part of Stonewall?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13067031218 fall within Stonewall (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13067031218 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13067031218 compare to Vinings overall?
Tract 13067031218 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Vinings at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Vinings; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Vinings
Top eight tracts in Vinings ranked by composite eviction-risk score.