Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally

Little Five Points Eviction Risk: Lower , Atlanta

Tract 13089020400 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 2,709 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Tract 13089020400, home to 2,709 residents in the Little Five Points area of Atlanta, scores 5.7/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 65th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 44% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 40% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,607 monthly, set against $188,438 in average yearly household income, roughly 10% of income at the averages. Renters make up 21% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 12% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,175
Renter share21.4%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate2.9%
Median income$188,438

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Little Five Points
Moderate
Within parent city
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#175 of 180 tracts In Atlanta
Very Low
Within county
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#172 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Very Low
Within state
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#2,277 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Atlanta and the region

Centroid at 33.7661, -84.3443 · click any tract to drill in

Why Little Five Points scores 2.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Atlanta
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
2.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,607 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Atlanta
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Atlanta
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Atlanta
4.0

How Little Five Points compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Little Five Points risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.22.2This tracttract 020400Atlanta: 3.43.4Atlantaparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 294Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 7.10%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.4%Peak (2013)
  • 6Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890204002004: 55 filings (8.86/100 renter HHs)2007: 40 filings (7.21/100 renter HHs)2011: 37 filings (7.52/100 renter HHs)2012: 50 filings (10.16/100 renter HHs)2013: 61 filings (12.40/100 renter HHs)2014: 25 filings (5.08/100 renter HHs)2015: 20 filings (4.07/100 renter HHs)2016: 6 filings (1.49/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 89% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 70Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Little Five Points

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Atlanta eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Part of this tract, about 9% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089020400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089020400?

Census tract 13089020400 in the Little Five Points neighborhood scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089020400?

Median gross rent is $1,607/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089020400?

2.9% of residents in tract 13089020400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,709.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089020400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 1th, minority 29th, housing 14th.
Q5

Is tract 13089020400 considered part of Little Five Points?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089020400 fall within Little Five Points (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089020400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 294 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089020400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.10% of renter households, peaking at 12.4% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089020400 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089020400 compare to Atlanta overall?

Tract 13089020400 scores 2.2/10, lower than the parent city of Atlanta at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Atlanta eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 13089020400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 9% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Atlanta

Top eight tracts in Atlanta ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related