Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Montreal Eviction Risk: Lower , Tucker

Tract 13089021703 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 4,346 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

Census tract 13089021703 covers part of the Montreal area of Tucker, GA, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,346. Against DeKalb County at 52.2%, 25% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 4% Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units1,645
Renter share5.6%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate3.2%
Median income$198,393

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Montreal
Very Low
Within parent city
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 18 tracts In Tucker
Very Low
Within county
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#203 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Very Low
Within state
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#2,121 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tucker and the region

Centroid at 33.8452, -84.2757 · click any tract to drill in

Why Montreal scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tucker
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
3.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tucker
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tucker
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tucker
7.3

How Montreal compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Montreal risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0217034.3Tuckerparent city4.5Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 14

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 30Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 2.83%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.8%Peak (2011)
  • 1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 13089021703
Filings dropped 80% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 25Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Montreal. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Montreal

What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.7/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10.

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.7/10. It sits 1.5 points below the DeKalb County average of 4.5. SNAP participation runs 2.8% against 15.2% nationally.

Housing insecurity runs 4.6% against 14.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 30 filings here across 8 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2011 at 5.8% of renter households.

In a typical year about 2.8% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 6% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 2.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021703

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021703?

Census tract 13089021703 in the Montreal neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021703?

3.2% of residents in tract 13089021703 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,346.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021703?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 43th, minority 33th, housing 40th.
Q4

Is tract 13089021703 considered part of Montreal?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021703 fall within Montreal (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089021703?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 30 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089021703 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.83% of renter households, peaking at 5.8% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 13089021703 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13089021703 compare to Tucker overall?

Tract 13089021703 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Tucker at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tucker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tucker

Top eight tracts in Tucker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related