Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally
Montreal Eviction Risk: Lower , Tucker
Tract 13089021703 ·
DeKalb County, GA · pop 4,346 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi
Census tract 13089021703 runs through Montreal in Tucker. With 4,346 residents, it scores 5.8/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #26,223 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
25% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $198,393 a year. Renters make up 6% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%Stable renters 4%Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units1,645
Renter share5.6%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate3.2%
Median income$198,393
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Montreal
Very Low
Within parent city
0th percentile
#18 of 18 tracts In Tucker
Very Low
Within county
12th percentile
#179 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Very Low
Within state
13th percentile
#2,428 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Tucker and the region
Centroid at 33.8452, -84.2757 · click any tract to drill in
Why Montreal scores 1.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tucker
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
3.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tucker
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tucker
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tucker
7.3
How Montreal compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 14
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
1%Socioeconomic
43%Household composition
33%Racial/ethnic minority
40%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
30Total filings over 8 yrs
2.83%Avg annual filing rate
5.8%Peak (2011)
1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2004 to 2016
Filings dropped 80% over the past 8 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
25Total filings 2020-21
0.3Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
4.6%Housing insecurity
2.9%Utility-shutoff threat
4.7%Food insecurity
2.8%SNAP enrollment
3.3%Transit barriers
5.6%No health insurance
10.8%Frequent mental distress
18.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Montreal
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tucker eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 30 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 2.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.8% of renter households in 2011.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 14th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 13089021703
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021703?
Census tract 13089021703 in the Montreal neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021703?
3.2% of residents in tract 13089021703 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,346.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021703?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 43th, minority 33th, housing 40th.
Q4
Is tract 13089021703 considered part of Montreal?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021703 fall within Montreal (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089021703?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 30 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089021703 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.83% of renter households, peaking at 5.8% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 13089021703 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13089021703 compare to Tucker overall?
Tract 13089021703 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Tucker at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tucker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Tucker
Top eight tracts in Tucker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.