Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Pittsburg Eviction Risk: Lower , Tucker

Tract 13089021821 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 2,961 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 13089021821 covers part of the Pittsburg area of Tucker, GA, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,961. 20% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the DeKalb County average of 52.2%.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 14% Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units1,202
Renter share17.0%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate4.6%
Median income$160,972

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Pittsburg
Very Low
Within parent city
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 18 tracts In Tucker
Very Low
Within county
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#194 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Very Low
Within state
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#2,121 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tucker and the region

Centroid at 33.8663, -84.2275 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pittsburg scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tucker
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
4.6% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$2,169 rent vs county FMR
6.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tucker
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tucker
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tucker
7.3

How Pittsburg compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pittsburg risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0218214.3Tuckerparent city4.5Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 7

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 17Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Pittsburg. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pittsburg

The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.7/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.1/10.

At $2,169 a month, rents run 32% over what the rest of Tucker commands. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.7/10. The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Against the DeKalb County average of 4.5, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.5 points. Food insecurity runs 6.5% against 17.8% nationally.

The voucher gap is 18.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Housing insecurity runs 6.1% against 14.2% nationally.

Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 17% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021821

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021821?

Census tract 13089021821 in the Pittsburg neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089021821?

Median gross rent is $2,169/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 20% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021821?

4.6% of residents in tract 13089021821 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,961.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021821?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 9th, household 37th, minority 37th, housing 4th.
Q5

Is tract 13089021821 considered part of Pittsburg?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021821 fall within Pittsburg (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 13089021821 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13089021821 compare to Tucker overall?

Tract 13089021821 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Tucker at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tucker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tucker

Top eight tracts in Tucker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related